PARAYAKAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,CHERTHALA vs. JT.COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, RANGE 1, ALAPPUZHA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the delay in filing the tax audit report was due to circumstances beyond the assessee's control, considering it is a co-operative society governed by state government laws. Consequently, the penalty levied under Section 271B was deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative bank, filed its tax audit report belatedly on March 19, 2018, instead of the due date of October 31, 2017. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment on December 28, 2019.
What were the issues?
Whether the penalty under Section 271B for belated filing of the tax audit report should be deleted when the delay was due to circumstances beyond the assessee's control.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 271B,Section 143(3),Section 274B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh
O R D E R Per Bench : This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-2018 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC’s DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1055610454(1) dated 31.08.2023, in proceedings u/s.274B of the Income- tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act” hereinafter.
Case file perused. Case called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex parte.
Learned DR vehemently argues during the hearing that both the lower authorities have rightly levied the impugned sec.271B penalty on account of the assessee having belatedly filed its tax audit report on 19.03.2018 whereas the “due” date . Parayakad SCB Limited. thereof was on 31.10.2017. A perusal of the case file indicates that the Learned Assessing Officer infact had completed his sec.143(3) assessment on 28.12.2019. That being the case and in light of the fact that the assessee is a co-operative society governed by various procedural approvals as per the state government law, we are of the considered view that the foregoing delay in filing its tax audit report is on account of circumstances beyond its control. We accordingly delete the impugned sec.271B penalty in very terms. Ordered accordingly.
This assessee’s appeal is allowed in above terms.
Order pronounced in the open court on this 25th day of September, 2024.
More judgments on Section 271B
- Devayatbhai Kalotara, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, RajkotITA 679/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2867/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2866/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2865/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2864/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026