M/S.UMAYANALLOOR SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KOLLAM vs. THE ITO WARD 4, KOLLAM
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, following the jurisdictional High Court's decision in PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd., held that interest income from deposits in co-operative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d), not Section 80P(2)(a)(i).
What were the facts?
The assessee, a service co-operative bank, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) on interest income earned from deposits made in co-operative banks. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) disallowed this deduction.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by a co-operative society from deposits in other co-operative banks is deductible under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) or Section 80P(2)(d).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Pr. CIT v. Totagars1,074 citing395 ITR 611 · 2017 · HC
- PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd.208 citing442 ITR 141 · 2022 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh
Appellant by: Shri G. Surendranath Rao, CA Respondent by: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 12.08.2024 Date of Pronouncement: 25.09.2024 O R D E R Per Bench These assessee’s twin appeals arise against National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)]’s as many orders in proceedings u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) as below: - DIN & Order No. Date No. 1 389/Coch/2023 2016-17 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 24.03.2023 23/1051228085(1) 2 390/Coch/2023 2018-19 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 28.03.2023 23/1051464450(1) Heard both the parties. Case files perused.
It emerges at the outset that the assessee’s identical sole substantive grievance raised in both the instant appeals seeks to reverse both the lower authorities’ action disallowing section 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction claim of Rs.2,02,04,788/- and
Learned Sr. AR vehemently argued in the course of hearing that such an interest income could have hardly be held even derived from assessee’s regular credit facilities made available to the members concerned as per PCIT & Anr. v. Totagars Co-operative Sales Society reported in (2017) 395 ITR 611 (Kar.) and submits that the impugned disallowance has been rightly made herein.
We notice in this background that the very issue stands adjudicated in hon'ble jurisdictional high court’s recent decision in PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. [2022] 442 ITR 141 (Ker) wherein their Lordships have rejected the Revenue’s identical stand as under: - “12.2 Section 80P deals with Co-operative Societies' computation of income. As already noted, it has four sections and several sub-sections and clauses. The Parliament has considered the various situations in which the exigible income and the deductable income of the assessee is considered while computing the income of the assessee. For getting deduction, in our considered view, the assessee must also establish that the interest income earned by the assessee is from a Co-operative Society. As a matter of fact, in the case on hand, there is no dispute that it is not from a Co-operative Society registered under Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. The interest income earned from District Co-operative Bank/State Co-operative Bank, in the facts and circumstances of the case, do come within Section 80P(2)(d). Therefore, the income constitutes income from other sources and the only eligible deduction is covered by Section 80P(2)(d) viz. Interest or dividend derived by the assessee from its investments with any other Co-operative Society. The source of interest income is from Bank and Treasury, interest income received from Treasury be included in the computation of total income of the assessee. In other words, interest earned from Treasury is inadmissible for deduction and interest income from Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act are eligible for deduction. The contra consideration of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal is incorrect and liable to be modified as stated above. Hence, it is held that the interest income & 390/Coch/2023 Umayanallor Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. earned by the assessee does not come within the ambit of Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and permissible deduction of interest income is limited to Co-operative Societies/Banks registered under Kerala Co-operative Societies Act under clause (d) of the Act and effect order on the above lines is made by the Assessing Officer. The questions are accordingly answered.”
We adopt the above detailed discussion mutatis mutandis in the case of assessee’s section 80P deduction claim(s). Necessary computation shall follow as per law in very terms. ordered accordingly.
These assessee’s twin appeals ITA.Nos.389 & 390/Coch/2023 are allowed in above terms. A copy of this common order be placed in the respective files. Order pronounced in the open court on 25th September, 2024.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- The Development Multipurpose Credit &… vs ITO Ward 2 (4), Porbandar, GujaratITA 458/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hislop College Employees Cooperative Credit… vs ITO Ward 2(3), NagpurITA 184/NAG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026