CHERUVARAKONAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. I.T.O, WARD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM

PDF · subscribers
ITA 579/COCH/2024Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 October 2024AY 2020-21Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara (Judicial Member), Shri Amarjit Singh (Judicial Member)2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored all issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The assessee was given three effective opportunities to plead and prove their case, with the risk and responsibility solely on them.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal arose from an ex-parte order by the CIT(A) which confirmed the Assessing Officer's disallowance of Section 80P deduction and additions under Sections 68 and 69C. The CIT(A) order was passed without addressing the factual matrix as required by Section 250(6).

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) order was validly passed without considering the factual matrix and points of determination. Whether the ex-parte assessment by the AO and subsequent appellate order were justified.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P,Section 68,Section 69C,Section 250,Section 250(6)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN

Before: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Arun Raj S., Advocate
For Respondent: Dr. S. Pandian, CIT-DR
Hearing: 16.08.2024Pronounced: 23.10.2024

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA No. 579/Coch/2024
SA No. 78/Coch/2024

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

O R D E R Per Bench This assessee’s appeal, along with the stay application, for A.Y. 2020-21 arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)]’s DIN & Order No. ITBA/ NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1059763006(1) dated 16.01.2024 in proceedings u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

Heard both parties. Case files perused.

2.

It emerges at the outset with the able assistance coming from both the parties that the CIT(A)/NFAC has passed it’s exparte lower appellate order confirming the Assessing Officer’s action making section(s) 80P deduction disallowance followed by section(s) 68 & 69C addition(s) thereby involving varying sum(s), without dealing & SA No. 78/Coch/2024 Cheruvarakonam Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. with the relevant factual matrix as contemplated u/s. 250(6) of the Act requiring him to frame points of determination followed by a detailed discussion thereupon. We further note that the Assessing Officer had also framed his assessment ex-parte only. Faced with this situation, we deem it appropriate to restore all the issues back to the Assessing Officer for his afresh appropriate adjudication with a rider that it shall be the assessee’s risk and responsibility only to plead and prove all the relevant facts within three effective opportunities of hearing in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.

3.

Delay of 90 days in filing the appeal stands condoned considering the reasons given in the condonation application.

4.

This assessee’s appeal ITA.No.579/Coch./2024 is allowed for statistical purposes and it’s stay application SA.No.78/Coch./2024 is dismissed as rendered infructuous. A copy of this common order be placed in the respective case files.

More judgments on Section 80P

All 5,069 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →