CHERUVARAKONAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. I.T.O, WARD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored all issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The assessee was given three effective opportunities to plead and prove their case, with the risk and responsibility solely on them.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal arose from an ex-parte order by the CIT(A) which confirmed the Assessing Officer's disallowance of Section 80P deduction and additions under Sections 68 and 69C. The CIT(A) order was passed without addressing the factual matrix as required by Section 250(6).
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order was validly passed without considering the factual matrix and points of determination. Whether the ex-parte assessment by the AO and subsequent appellate order were justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80P,Section 68,Section 69C,Section 250,Section 250(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
O R D E R Per Bench This assessee’s appeal, along with the stay application, for A.Y. 2020-21 arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)]’s DIN & Order No. ITBA/ NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1059763006(1) dated 16.01.2024 in proceedings u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
Heard both parties. Case files perused.
It emerges at the outset with the able assistance coming from both the parties that the CIT(A)/NFAC has passed it’s exparte lower appellate order confirming the Assessing Officer’s action making section(s) 80P deduction disallowance followed by section(s) 68 & 69C addition(s) thereby involving varying sum(s), without dealing & SA No. 78/Coch/2024 Cheruvarakonam Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. with the relevant factual matrix as contemplated u/s. 250(6) of the Act requiring him to frame points of determination followed by a detailed discussion thereupon. We further note that the Assessing Officer had also framed his assessment ex-parte only. Faced with this situation, we deem it appropriate to restore all the issues back to the Assessing Officer for his afresh appropriate adjudication with a rider that it shall be the assessee’s risk and responsibility only to plead and prove all the relevant facts within three effective opportunities of hearing in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.
Delay of 90 days in filing the appeal stands condoned considering the reasons given in the condonation application.
This assessee’s appeal ITA.No.579/Coch./2024 is allowed for statistical purposes and it’s stay application SA.No.78/Coch./2024 is dismissed as rendered infructuous. A copy of this common order be placed in the respective case files.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026