OMASSERY MERCANTIL CO-OPERATIVE SOCITY LTD.,KOZHIKODE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD2(3), KOZHIKODE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the amendment to Section 143(1)(a)(v) allowing disallowance of Section 80P deduction was effective from April 1, 2021. Therefore, it could not be applied retrospectively to the assessment year 2019-20.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80P for AY 2019-20. The Assessing Officer disallowed this deduction through a processing order under Section 143(1)(a)(v). The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of Section 80P deduction under Section 143(1)(a)(v) was valid for AY 2019-20 given the amendment's effective date.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh
This assessee’s appeal in for assessment year 2019-2020 arises out of the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) / NFAC vide DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 24/1056332559(1) dated 20.09.2023 in proceedings u/s.154 of the Income- tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act” hereinafter.
Case called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex parte.
It appears at the outset that there is hardly had any need for us to give detailed consideration to the assessee’s sole substantive grievance seeking to reverse both the learned lower authorities action disallowing its section 80P deduction claimed by way of section 143(1)(a)(v) “processing” . Omassery Mercantile Co-op Society Ltd. dated 16.04.2020 as upheld in the lower appellate ex-parte discussion. This is for the precise reason that the legislature has amended section 143(1)(a)(v) enabling provision to this effect by way of amendment in the Finance Act, 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 whereas the impugned assessment order is AY 2019-20. Meaning thereby that both the learned lower authorities could not have invoked s.143(1)(a)(v) “processing” retrospectively for disallowing assessee’s impugned section 80P deduction. We accept the assessee’s instant sole substantive ground in very terms. Ordered accordingly. Accordingly, assessee’s appeal is allowed.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Radheshyam Bhoi vs. The Comnr. Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 2 Nov 2026
- Dharmajit Mishra vs. The Comnr. Of CT. And GST, OdishaOrissa · 2 Nov 2026
- Tapan Kumar Sahu vs. The Comnr. CT. And GST, OdishaOrissa · 2 Nov 2026
- Sanjeet Kumar Bagh vs. The Comn. CT. And GST, OdishaOrissa · 2 Nov 2026
- Rakesh Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 2 Nov 2026