Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh
O R D E R Per Bench This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2015-16 arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)]’s DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 23/1050343184(1) dated 02.03.2023 in proceedings u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
Heard both the parties. Case files perused.
It emerges at the outset with the able assistance coming from both the parties that the CIT(A)/NFAC has passed ex-parte it’s lower appellate order confirming the Assessing Officer’s action making addition of Rs. 20,13,800/- claimed as agricultural income without dealing with the relevant factual matrix as contemplated u/s. 250(6) of the Act requiring him to frame points of determination followed by a detailed SA 123/C/2023 Elinjikkal Devassykutty Reju discussion thereon. Faced with this situation, we deem it fit appropriate to restore the issue back to the Assessing Officer for his afresh verification and adjudication with the rider that it shall be the assessee’s risk and responsibility only to plead and prove all the related facts within three effective opportunities of hearing. Ordered accordingly.
Delay of 101 days in filing the instant appeal is condoned as per assessee’s solemn averments in light of Collector, Land Acquisition vs., MST Katiji [1987] 167 ITR 471 (SC) having settled the law long back that all such technical aspects must make a way for the cause of substantial justice.
This assessee’s appeal ITA.No.588/Coch/2023 is allowed for statistical purposes and the stay application SA.No.123/Coch./2023 is dismissed as rendered infructuous. A copy of this common order be placed in the respective case files.