INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-4(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. MAJESTIC MARCOM PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1281/KOL/2023Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 November 2024AY 2012-13Bench: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR (Accountant Member), SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY (Judicial Member)2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. However, it noted that the appeal was not maintainable as per CBDT Instruction No. 9 of 2024 due to the low tax effect.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) with a delay of 107 days. The tax effect of the relief granted by the CIT(A) was less than Rs. 60,00,000/-.

What were the issues?

Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal when the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limit as per CBDT instructions.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, KOLKATA

For Appellant: Shri Manish Tiwari, AR
For Respondent: Shri Praveen Kishore, DR
Hearing: 20.11.2024Pronounced: 29.11.2024

O R D E R

Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:

1.

This is an appeal preferred by the Revenue against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 15/06/2023 for the AY 2012-13.

2.

At the outset, there is a delay of 107 days in filing the appeal. That after a detailed discussion, the bench considered the delay and accordingly, the delay for 107 days is condoned. Accordingly, the delay for 107 days is condoned and appeal is taken for adjudication.

3.

We have gone through the grounds raised by the Revenue. It is pertinent to note that the tax effect by virtue of relief given by the first appellate authority is less than Rs.60,00,000/-. As per CBDT Instruction bearing No. 9 of 2024 issued on 17th September, 2024, CBDT has directed its subordinate authorities not to challenge the order of ld. CIT(Appeals)

4.

On due consideration of the above facts and circumstances, we dismiss this appeal of the Revenue for want of tax effect. However, in case on re- verification of the facts at the end of the Assessing Officer, it emerges that the tax effect is more than the limit for filing the appeal or this case falls in any of the exceptions provided in the instruction, then the Revenue will be at liberty to file a Miscellaneous Application for revival of this appeal. Such application should be filed within the time limit provided in the Act.

5.

In the result, all the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 29.11. 2024.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →