Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh
O R D E R Per Bench : This assessee’s appeal in for assessment year 2017-2018 arises out of the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) / NFAC vide DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1058279502(1) dated 11.12.2023, in proceedings u/s.143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act” hereinafter.
It emerges at the outset that the assessee’s sole substantive ground challenges unexplained specified bank notes deposits addition of Rs.77.90 lakh made in the course of assessment dated 16.12.2019, upheld by the CIT(A) in the lower appellate discussion. Learned counsel vehemently supports the assessee’s pleadings seeking to delete the entire addition amount.
. Padmavathy Medical Foundation. 3. The Revenue, on the other hand, invited our attention to assessment findings wherein the assessee has attributed the source of the impugned sum under various heads, i.e., loans and gifts alongwith regular revenue receipts in hospital business.
We have given our thoughtful consideration to the foregoing rival stands and prima facie we note that the assessee has not been able to support its above explanation of the cash deposits, in the lower proceedings. The facts however remains possibility of some cash receipts/respective heads and cash in hand could not be altogether ruled out in such instance.
Faced with this situation, we restrict the impugned addition to Rs.62,90,000 in larger interest of justice in the given facts and circumstances of the case. The assessee gets relief of Rs.15 lakh in other words. Necessary computation shall follow as per law in very terms. Ordered accordingly.