PERUVEMBA SAHAKARANA URBAN CREDIT SOCIETY,PRUVEMBA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, PALAKKAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the denial of deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) solely on the ground of providing credit facilities to nominal members is unjustified. This is based on the Supreme Court's decision in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a primary agricultural credit co-operative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P. The Assessing Officer denied this deduction, holding the assessee was not a primary agricultural co-operative society as it provided credit to nominal members.
What were the issues?
Whether a co-operative society is disentitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) if it provides credit facilities to nominal members.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT999 citing431 ITR 1 · 2021 · SC
- Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. v. ACIT499 citing397 ITR 1 · 2017 · SC
- U.P. Cooperative Cane Unions’ Federation Ltd., Lucknow v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow-I120 citing11 SCC 287 · 1997
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Inturi Rama Rao
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 26.02.2024 for Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a primary agricultural credit co- operative society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. The return of income for AY 2016-17 was filed on 10.03.2018 declaring Nil income after claiming deduction of Rs. 30,82,959/- u/s. 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Against the said return of income, assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer (AO) vide order dated 26.12.2018. While doing so the AO had denied exemption u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act by holding that the assessee is not a primary agricultural co-operative society, as it also provides credit facilities to nominal Peruvemba Sahakarana Urban Credit Society members who are classified as class B and class C members and placing reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of The Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. v. Asst. CIT [2017] 397 ITR 1 (SC).
Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A) who vide the impugned order confirmed the action of the AO.
Being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. The solitary issue that arises in both the appeals is where the lower authorities were justified in denying deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act solely on the ground that the assessee co-operative society also provided credit facilities to nominal members. The issue in the appeal is no more res integra as it is settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT [2021] 431 ITR 1 (SC) after making a reference to its earlier judgement in the case of UP Cooperative Cane Unions’ Federation Ltd. 11 SCC 287 wherein it is held that the expression “member” includes nominal members under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act and therefore it was held that denial of exemption u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act is unjustified solely on the ground that the assessee society also provides loans to the nominal members. In the light of the decision by the Hon'ble Apex Court, the AO is directed to allow the deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act as claimed by the assessee.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Ritik vs. State Of M.P.Madhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026