YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION,THRISSUR vs. THE ITO EXEMPTION WARD, THRISSUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 385/COCH/2023Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 November 2024AY 2023-24Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(Exemption) passed a short, unreasoned order without affording the assessee a sufficient opportunity to be heard. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh disposal.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a charitable institution, applied for fresh registration under Section 12A(1)(ac) of the Income Tax Act after a new provision was inserted. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application, alleging incomplete information and improper clauses.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Exemption) was justified in refusing registration without a reasoned order and proper opportunity to the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA,Section 12A(1)(ac)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JM

For Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Hearing: 19.11.2024Pronounced: 29.11.2024

Per: Inturi Rama Rao, AM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) dated 31.03.2023 denying grant of registration u/s. 12AA of Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter "the Act").

2.

Brief facts of the case are that the assessee was charitable institution duly registered u/s. 12AA of the Act. As per the new Young Women Christian Association insertion of section 12A(1)(ac) by the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, assessee applied for fresh registration. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Kochi rejected the assessee’s application for renewal of registration u/s. 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act, by alleging that the assessee had not furnished fully the information called for. He also stated that the mandatory clauses such as amendment clause, irrevocable clause and dissolution clause are not in proper manner.

3.

Being aggrieved, assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.

4.

When the appeal was called none appeared on behest of the assessee nor there any application for adjournment. Therefore, we proceed to dispose the appeal after hearing the learned CIT-DR.

5.

The solitary issue that arises in the present appeal is whether or not the learned CIT (Exemption) is justified in refusing grant of registration u/s. 12A of the Act. From a mere reading of the impugned order it would be evident that the CIT (Exemption) has passed a very short unreasoned order without discussing the points for consideration. Further, it is not evident from the impugned order whether the assessee was afforded reasonable and sufficient opportunity to present his case during the course of proceedings before the CIT (Exemption). In the circumstances we are of the considered opinion that the interest of justice would be met if the matter is restored to the file of the CIT (Exemption) for de novo

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →