APPROVA EXPORT PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-2(2), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 678/KOL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 December 2024AY 2012-13Bench: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR (Accountant Member), SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found conflicting findings in the assessment order and the CIT(A)'s order regarding the assessee's role as an accommodation entry provider. Therefore, the matter was restored to the AO for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was against the confirmation of an addition of ₹60 lacs made by the AO under Section 68. The AO had repeatedly stated the assessee was an accommodation entry provider but added the entire amount, which the CIT(A) affirmed.

What were the issues?

Whether the entire amount of ₹60 lacs could be added to the assessee's income when the AO had concluded the assessee was an accommodation entry provider, and if the lower authorities' findings were contradictory.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, KOLKATA

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, AR
For Respondent: Shri Prabhakar Prakash Ranjan
Hearing: 04.12.2024Pronounced: 16.12.2024

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-10, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 28.02.2019 for the AY 2012-13.

2.

The only issue raised by the assessee against the confirmation of addition of ₹60 lacs by the ld. CIT (A) as made u/s 68 of the Act by the ld. AO.

3.

The ld AR at the outset submitted that the AO in last para at page no.1 of the assessment order stated that the assessee is engaged in bogus /accommodation entries provider and also layering for transfer of black money to beneficiary companies. Similar on page no.3 of the assessment order , the ld. AO again noted that the

4.

The ld. DR relied on the order of lower authorities.

5.

After herring the rival contentions and perusing the materials available on record, we find that the ld. AO in the assessment order at several places given finding that the assessee is a accommodation entry provider thereby converting the black money into white money and passing on to various beneficiaries and entities. However, the addition made was in contraction to the conclusion drawn by the AO in the assessment order. Similarly the ld. CIT (A) affirmed the order by relying various case laws which is again in contraction to the finding given by the ld. AO that the assessee is an accommodation entry provider. Considering these facts and circumstances, in our opinion it would be reasonable to restore the appeal to the file of the ld. AO for

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 16.12.2024.

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →