GANDHI MANDELA FOUNDATION,BADARPUR,SOUTH DELHI vs. CIT EXEMPTION, CIVIC CENTER
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee should be given an opportunity to be heard by the CIT(E). The matter was remitted back to the CIT(E) for a decision on merits after providing a hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for provisional registration under Section 80G was cancelled by the CIT(E) without providing an opportunity for the assessee to be heard. The assessee contended that this violated principles of natural justice.
What were the issues?
Whether the cancellation of provisional registration under Section 80G without a proper hearing violates principles of natural justice. Whether the assessee is entitled to regular registration under Section 80G.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI
Before: SH. SUDHIR KUMAR & SH. MANISH AGARWAL
Date of hearing: 04/11/2025 Date of Pronouncement: 19/11/2025 ORDER PER SUDHIR KUMAR, JM:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal (Exemption), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(E)”], vide order dated 31.12.2024 pertaining to A.Y. 2024-25.
The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal :-
1. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(E) has erred in facts and in law cancelling the provisional registration under clause (iv) of sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 vide its order dated 31.12.2024;
2. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(E) has erred in facts and in law, in not considering that the assessee is strictly engaged in charitable activities and hence there was no reason for cancelling the provisional registration and not granting the regular registration u/s. 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of such activities;
3. That the CIT(E) has erred in law in acting in a haste and hurried manner, rather than giving a proper show cause notice of hearing to the assessee to explain its case and justify its stand while cancelling the provisional registration and not granting the regular registration U/s. 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. The brief facts of the case are that ld. CIT (E) has rejected the application for exemption u/s 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) without giving any opportunity of being heard to the assessee and is against the principles of natural justice. Accordingly, assessee prayed that this issue may be remitted back to the ld. CIT(E) with the prayer to give an opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
On the other hand, ld. DR for the Revenue objected to the submissions of the ld. counsel for the assessee and relied on the order of Ld. CIT (E).
We have heard ld. DR and gone through the material available on record.We observed that the assessee submitted the ld. CIT (E) rejected the application for exemption u/s 80G of the Act without giving any opportunity of being heard to the assessee. In our considered view and in the interest of justice, assessee should be given one more opportunity of being heard on merit. Therefore, we direct Ld. CIT (E) to give an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and decide the issue on merit as per law. We also direct assessee to make proper submissions and appear before the ld.CIT (E) on the date of hearing and cooperate with the tax authorities. We remit this issue also back to the file of ld. CIT (E) in the interest of justice. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 19.11.2025.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026