SUMITRA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS (P) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT TDS CIRCLE-75(1), DELHI

PER KRINWANT SAHAY, AM: Appeal in this case has been filed against the order dated 28.02.2024 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)/Addl./JCIT(A)-5, Mumbai, for Assessment Year 2013-14 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- “1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, CIT(A) erred in disposing off the appeal without providing the Assessee proper / adequate opportunity of being heard. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, CIT(A) erred in confirming sums charges u/s.201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act amounting to Rs.43,46,100/ - & Rs.40,85,334/ - respectively.” 3. At the very outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee brought it to the notice of the Bench that the ld. CIT(A) has passed this order without bringing on record the submission of the assessee. Thus, it is an ex-parte order without considering the assessee’s side of arguments. 4. Per Contra, ld. DR relied upon the orders of the authorities below. 5. We have considered the findings given by the ld. CIT(A) in his order and we find that the ld. CIT(A) has passed ex-parte order without taking on record the submission of the assessee on the issue of addition made by the Assessing Officer. Keeping in view of natural justice, we find that the assessee should be given another opportunity to file his submissions to the ld. CIT(A) and the Ld. CIT(A) should pass order on merit after giving adequate opportunity to the assessee as required in the law. Accordingly, this appeal is remanded back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) 6. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 19th November, 2025. [ANUBHAV SHARMA]
[KRINWANT SAHAYA]
JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated 19.11.2025
f{x~{tÜ
f{x~{tÜ
f{x~{tÜ
f{x~{tÜ

3 ITA No.4818/Del/2025