AJIT PADHEE,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-2(3), BHUBANESWAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 144/CTK/2017Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack02 August 2017AY 2010-112 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal inferred that the assessee was not interested in pursuing the appeal. Following precedent, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2010-2011. The appeal was scheduled for hearing, but neither the assessee nor their representative appeared before the Tribunal on the scheduled date.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the non-appearance of the assessee before the Tribunal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK

Before: SHRI N.S SAINI

For Respondent: Shri D.K.Pradhan, DR
Hearing: 02/08Pronounced: 02/08

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-

2, Bhubaneswar, dated 15.12.2016 for the assessment year 2010-2011.

2.

This case was initially fixed for hearing on 26.7.2017 and at the

request of ld D.R., the hearing was adjourned to 2.8.2017. Both the

parties were informed in the Court about the next date of hearing.

However, on 2.8.2017, when the matter was called for hearing, no one

appeared on behalf of the assessee and neither any application for

adjournment was filed. From the above, it is inferred that the assessee is

not interested in pursuing the appeal before the Tribunal. Following the

2 ITA No. 144/CT K/ 2017 Asse ssment Year :20 10- 201 1 decision of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan

India (P) ltd., 38 ITD 320, I dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

3.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 02/08/2017. Sd/- (N.S Saini) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Cuttack; Dated 02 /08/2017 B.K.Parida, SPS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The appellant : Ajit Padhee At: Plot No.313 Kharavela Nagar, Bhubaneswar. 2. The Respondent. ITO, Ward 2(3), Bhubaneswar 3. The CIT(A) -2, Bhubaneswar 4. Pr.CIT-2, Bhubaneswar 5. DR, ITAT, Cuttack 6. Guard file. BY ORDER, //True Copy//

SR.PRIVATE SECRETARY ITAT, Cuttack

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →