M/S. ORISSA INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION,CUTTACK vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(Exemptions) was not justified in rejecting the application. The amendment clause did not require prior CIT approval, and the dissolution clause adequately provided for assets to be transferred to a similar registered society or the government.
What were the facts?
The assessee society applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application, citing deficiencies in the amendment and dissolution clauses of the society's Memorandum of Association.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemptions) was justified in rejecting the application for registration under Section 12AA based on the wording of the amendment and dissolution clauses in the Memorandum of Association.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK
Before: S/SHRI N.S SAINI & PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK
BEFORE S/SHRI N.S SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA No. 24/CTK/2016
Orissa Industries Vs. CIT (Exemptions), Association, New Industrial Hyderabad Estate, Jagatpur. PAN/GIR No. (Appellant) .. ( Respondent)
Assessee by : Shri Gouri Mohan Rath, AR Revenue by : Shri Kunal Singh, CIT DR
Date of Hearing : 09/08/ 2017 Date of Pronouncement : 11 /08/ 2017
O R D E R Per N.S.Saini, AM This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT
(Exemptions), Hyderabad Bhubaneswar dated 28.9.2015.
The sole issue involved in this appeal is that the CIT(Exemptions),
Hyderabad was not justified in rejecting application for registration
u/s.12AA of the Act as all the conditions required u/s.12AA are fulfilled by
the assessee.
The brief facts of the case are that the assessee society filed
application in Form No.10A seeking registration u/s.12AA of the Act.
The CIT (Exemptions), Hyderabad vide letter dated 3.8.2015
required the assessee to provide details of amendment clause and
dissolution clause in the Memorandum of Association alongwith detailed
note thereon.
After considering the details filed by the assessee, the CIT
(Exemptions) observed that” amendment clause” does not specifically
stipulate that the amendments shall be carried out only with the prior
approval of the CIT( E). He further observed that “Winding up clause”
does not specifically stipulate that on winding up of the society, the
remaining assets shall be transferred/paid to an institution having
registration u/s.12AA and approval u/s.80G(5) of the I.T.Act, 1961.
Hence, he rejected the application of the assessee society for grant of
registration u/s.12AA of the Act.
Ld A.R. of the assessee has filed before us copy of Memorandum of
Association and submitted that Article No.XVI provides for “Amendment
clauses” and Article No.XXII provides for “dissolution clauses” of the
society. Hence, he prayed that CIT(E) was not justified in refusing
registration to the assessee society u/s.12AA of the Act and prayed that
his order should be set aside and the CIT (E) be directed to grant
registration.
On the other hand ld D.R. supported the order of the CIT(E).
We have heard the rival submissions, perused the orders of lower
authorities and materials available on record. In the instant case, the
CIT(E) refused to grant registration to the assessee society u/s.12AA of
the assessee on the following grounds:
(i) The amendment clause in the Memorandum of Association (MOA) of the assessee society does not provide that amendments to the MOA shall be carried out with the prior approval of the CIT(Exemption).
(ii) The Winding Up clause in the MOA of the assessee society does not stipulate that on winding up the society, the remaining assets shall be transferred or paid to an institution having registration u/s.12AA of the Act and having approval u/s.80G of the Act.
As regards the first objection of the CIT(E), we find that the
amendment clause of the MoA of the assessee society does not provide
for prior approval of the CIT(Exemption). We find that there is no such
provision u/s.12AA of the Act and, therefore, in our considered view, the
CIT(Exemption) is not justified in rejecting application for registration of
the assessee society on this ground.
As regards to second objection i.e. “Winding up clause”, the CIT(E)
has stated that MoU does not contain dissolution clause. On perusal of
MoA, we find that the dissolution clause which reads as under:
“The Association may be dissolved of a General Meeting specially called for the purpose either by the Executive Committee or upon requisition by one third number of members provided that two third members present, vote for the same. Upon dissolution of the Association its assets will be handed over to a similar registered society or to the Government after clearing up all its debts and liabilities, subject to the income Tax Act and any other statue as may be applicable.”
A bare perusal of dissolution clause show that it provides that in the event
of dissolution of the assessee society, all assets will be handed over to a
similar registered society or to the Government. Thus, we find that the
CIT(E) was not justified in refusing to grant registration u/s.12AA of the
Act on this ground also.
For the foregoing reasons, in our considered opinion, the refusal to
grant registration u/s.12AA of the Act to the assessee society is not
proper and justified. Hence, we set aside the order of the
CIT(Exemption), Hyderabad and direct him to grant registration u/s.12AA
of the Act to the assessee society. Thus, the ground of appeal of the
assessee is allowed.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 11/08/2017.
Sd/- sd/- (Pavan Kumar Gadale) (N.S Saini) JUDICIALMEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Cuttack; Dated 11 /08/2017 B.K.Parida, SPS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : Orissa Industries Association, New Industrial Estate, Jagatpur 2. The Respondent. CI (E) Hyderabad. 3. The CIT(A)- 4. Pr.CIT- 5. DR, ITAT, Cuttack 6. Guard file. //True Copy// BY ORDER,
SR.PRIVATE SECRETARY ITAT, Cuttack
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Himansu Palei vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST CBIC Keonjhar Division, KeonjharOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Access Worldwide Cargo vs. The Commissioner Of CustomsKarnataka · 3 Nov 2026
- Sri Bharath Reddy vs. M/S Nagarjuna Group Of RestaurantsKarnataka · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Greenlam Industries LTD And Another vs. The UOI And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026