MANIK HALDER,BURDWAN vs. A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-1, DURGAPUR

Assessee is aggrieved in this appeal against the action of the Ld. CIT(A) in dismissing the rectification application filed by the assessee u/s. 154 of the Act. 4. At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee has brought our attention to the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) to submit that the same is an ex parte order. The Ld. Counsel in this respect has submitted that in fact the Ld. CIT(A) did not issue notice at the e-mail address provided by the assessee in appeal Form No. 35 filed before the Ld. CIT(A), therefore, the assessee was not aware of the date of hearing of the aforesaid application before the Ld. CIT(A). A separate affidavit in this respect has also been filed, wherein it has been stated that in From 35 in the relevant column no. 17, which was meant for address and e-mail at which the notice can be issued to the appellant, the e-mail ID was mentioned as “mpd_manik@hotmail.com” whereas, the notices were issued by the Ld. CIT(A) at the address mentioned in personal details along with e-mail at jitendermandal@india.com. The Ld. Counsel in this respect has submitted that none of the notices issued by the Ld. CIT(A) came to the notice of the assessee, therefore, the case of the assessee remained unrepresented before the Ld. CIT(A). He, therefore has pleaded that the assessee may be given an opportunity to present his case before the Ld. CIT(A). 5. In view of the above facts and submissions, we are of the view that interests of justice will be well served if the assessee is given an opportunity to present his case before the Ld. CIT(A). The impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) is accordingly, set aside and the matter in the appeal is restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) for decision afresh. The Ld. CIT(A) will give proper opportunity to the assessee to present his case and thereafter decide the matter in accordance with law. It is also directed that the Ld.