KUMARAPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NUMBER 2147 THAMALLACKAL,ALAPPUZHA vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, WARD 2, ALAPPUZHA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing before the lower authorities due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, the matter was remanded for de novo assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative bank, failed to file returns and respond to notices from the AO. The AO made a best judgment assessment of cash deposits as unexplained income. The CIT(A) confirmed this assessment.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing before the AO and CIT(A) due to the Covid-19 pandemic, and if so, whether a de novo assessment is warranted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JM
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
O R D E R Per: Inturi Rama Rao, AM These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against separate orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] all dated 15.03.2024 for Assessment Years (AYs) 2013-14, 2017-18 and 2020-21.
The assessee is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society registered under the Kerala Co-Operative Societies Act, 1969. The society had not filed regular returns of income. The Income Tax Officer, Ward -2, Alappuzha (hereinafter “the AO”), based on the TO 729/Coch/2024 Kumarapuram Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. information that the appellant made cash deposits with Alappuzha District Co-operative Bank, found that income has escaped assessment to tax. Accordingly issued notice u/s. 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). The appellant society neither complied with the notice u/s. 148 of the Act nor furnished any information in response to the notice issued u/s. 142(1) of the Act. Under the circumstances the AO was constrained to make best judgement assessment by assessing to tax the cash deposit of Rs. 1,12,00,000/- made in Alappuzha District Co-operative Bank as unexplained money of the appellant u/s. 69 of the Act vide assessment order dated 15.03.2022
Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), who vide the impugned order confirmed the action of the AO.
Being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal in the present appeal.
Before us it is submitted that the assessment proceedings were initiated during the period of Covid-19 pandemic. The notices issued by the AO were not served on the appellant and, therefore, the appellant could not appear before either the AO or CIT(A). Similarly the hearing notices were issued by the CIT(A) through email, which went unnoticed. In the circumstances it is prayed that the orders of the lower authorities may be set aside and remanded back to the AO for de novo assessment.
Having considered the rival submissions and perusal of the material on record, we are of the considered opinion that the appellant was prevented by sufficient and reasonable cause from putting in appearance before the AO and CIT(A). Therefore, in order to meet the ends of justice the matter is remanded back to the file of the AO for de novo assessment in accordance with law after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant.
In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 69
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ranchhodbhai Kurjibhai Kakadiya, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 553/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 670/VIZ/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 669/VIZ/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026