SOUTHERN PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the appeal concerning disallowance of proportionate interest and bad debts, directing deletion of the disallowances. For the second appeal, it directed deletion of interest disallowance and allowed the ground related to Section 244A interest computation, while dismissing the ground regarding taxability of interest relief.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against two orders of the CIT(A) concerning assessment years 2006-07. The appeals dealt with disallowances of proportionate interest expenditure and bad debts written off in one appeal, and disallowance of additional interest, taxability of interest relief, and computation of interest under Section 244A in the other.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the disallowance of proportionate interest on advances to group companies, the treatment of bad debts written off, the taxability of interest relief under a CDR package, and the computation of interest on refunds under Section 244A.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 263,Section 28(iv),Section 36(1)(iii),Section 244A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.2,118 citing313 ITR 340 · 2009 · HC
- S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT1,484 citing288 ITR 1 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- TRF Ltd. v. CIT714 citing323 ITR 397 · 2010 · SC
- CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd.501 citing307 CTR 121 · 2019 · SC
- CIT v. Hotel Savera119 citing239 ITR 795 · 1999 · HC
- ACG ASSOCIATED CAPSULES (P) LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-IV, MUMBAI22 citing18 Taxmann.com 137 · 2012 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
Aforesaid appeals by assessee were heard along with other appeals for various assessment years having common issues. ITA No.208/Chny/2023 arises out of an order passed b
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026