SASIKALA,CHENNAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NON CORPORATE WARD

PDF
ITA 1334/CHNY/2023Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 January 2024AY 2020-2021Bench: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE (RETD.) CHANDRAKANT VASANT BHADANG (President), SHRI MANJUNATHA.G, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)4 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE (RETD.) CHANDRAKANT VASANT BHADANG & SHRI MANJUNATHA.G, HON’BLE

Hearing: 23.01.2024Pronounced: 23.01.2024

आदेश / O R D E R PER MANJUNATHA.G, AM:

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of

the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Income Tax Department,

National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 25.10.2023, and

pertains to assessment year 2020-21.

2.

The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual

filed his return of income for AY 2020-21 on 31.03.2021 declaring total

ITA No.1334/Chny/2023 :: 2 ::

income of Rs.6,81,980/-. The case was selected for scrutiny to verify

large deductions/exemptions claimed under the head ‘long term capital

gains’. During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO provided

number of opportunities to the assessee, but the assessee neither

appeared nor furnished any details. Therefore, the AO completed

assessment u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short

“the Act") on 26.09.2022 and rejected deduction claimed u/s.54F of the

Act.

3.

Being aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee preferred

an appeal before the Ld.CIT(A). During the course of appellate

proceedings, the Ld.CIT(A) posted the case for hearing on three

occasions, but no compliance from the assessee. Therefore, the

Ld.CIT(A) disposed off appeal filed by the assessee ex parte for non-

prosecution and upheld additions made by the AO towards disallowance

of deductions claimed u/s.54F of the Act. Aggrieved by the order of the

Ld.CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before us.

4.

The Ld.Counsel for the assessee, Shri S. Seetharaman, CA,

submitted that although, the assessee did not respond to first two dates

of hearing, but when the appeal was posted on the third time on

25.10.2023, the assessee has filed a letter dated 25.10.2023 and sought

for adjournment on medical grounds. However, the Ld.CIT(A) without

considering the letter filed by the assessee seeking for adjournment of

ITA No.1334/Chny/2023 :: 3 ::

hearing, passed order on 25.10.2023 and dismissed the appeal on

technical grounds. Therefore, he submitted that one more opportunity

of hearing may be given to the assessee to go to Ld.CIT(A) to explain

his case.

5.

The Ld.DR present for the Revenue, fairly agreed that the appeal

may be set aside to the file of the Ld.CIT(A) to give one more opportunity

of hearing to the assessee to explain his case.

6.

We have heard both the parties, perused the materials available

on record and gone through orders of the authorities below. The

principles of natural justice demands that the appellate authority should

provide sufficient opportunities to the assessee to furnish necessary

evidences and to justify their case. The meaning thereby is that when

the assessee seeks adjournment by way of written letter with a reason,

it is the duty of appellate authorities to consider the request of the

assessee and post the case for hearing in any other convenient date. In

the present case, although, the assessee has filed a letter on

25.10.2023, i.e. on the date the appeal was fixed for hearing, seeking

adjournment on medical grounds, but the Ld.CIT(A) without considering

the request of the assessee, disposed off appeal on 25.10.2023 for non-

prosecution and also not decided the issues on merits in gross violation

of principles of natural justice. Therefore, we are of the considered view

that the appeal needs to go back to the file of the Ld.CIT(A) to give one

ITA No.1334/Chny/2023 :: 4 :: more opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Thus, we set aside the

appeal to the file of the Ld.CIT(A) with a direction to re-adjudicate the

issue on merits after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to

the assessee. Needless to say, the assessee shall appear before the

Ld.CIT(A) as and when the appeal is called for hearing and also file

necessary details without seeking any adjournment.

7.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical

purposes.

Order pronounced on the 23rd day of January, 2024, in Chennai.

Sd/- Sd/- (मंजूनाथा.जी) (चं�कांत वसंत भडंग) (MANJUNATHA.G) (C.V. BHADANG) लेखा सद(/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER अ%& /PRESIDENT चे�ई/Chennai, िदनांक/Dated: 23rd January, 2024. TLN आदेश की �ितिलिप अ*ेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ� / Appellant 3. आयकर आयु+ / CIT 5. गाड� फाईल / GF 2. ��थ� / Respondent 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध / DR

SASIKALA,CHENNAI vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, NON CORPORATE WARD | BharatTax