BANNARI AMMAN SUGARS EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE THRIFT&CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ERODE vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), ERODE

PDF
ITA 814/CHNY/2023Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 January 2024AY 2018-19Bench: HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member)3 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “सी” �ायपीठ चे�ई म�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय �ी महावीर िसंह, उपा� एवं माननीय �ी मनोज कुमार अ%वाल ,लेखा सद( के सम । BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपील सं./ ITA No.814/Chny/2023 (िनधा)रण वष) / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Bannari Amman Sugars ITO Employees Cooperative Thrift & Credit Ward-1(1), बनाम/ Society Ltd. Erode. PG 48 Althukombai Vs. Komarapalayam Post, Sathyamangalam, Erode District �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAEAB-2963-L (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (� थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ�कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri Ram Adhethyen (Advocate)-Ld. AR � थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT)- Ld. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of final Hearing : 29-01-2024 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 29-01-2024 आदेश / O R D E R

Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)

1.

Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19 arises out of the order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] on 11-11-2022 confirming denial of deduction u/s. 80P by Centralized Processing Center (CPC) u/s. 143(1) on 31-05-2019. The deduction was denied by invoking the provisions of Section 80AC since assessee filed return of income belatedly beyond due date as specified u/s 139(1).

2 ITA No.814/Chny/2023

2.

The Registry has noted delay of 184 days in the appeal, the condonation of which has been sought by the assessee on the strength of affidavit of the President of the assessee society. The Ld. AR has also placed on record the order passed by appropriate authority condoning the delay. The Ld. Sr. DR opposed the condonation of delay. However, keeping in mind cause of substantial justice, we condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication on merits. 3. In the impugned order, Ld.CIT(A) has held that provisions of Sec.139(1) r.w.s.80AC was mandatory for assessee co-operative society for claiming deduction u/s.80P. Since the assessee did not file return of income within the time prescribed u/s.139(1), it would not be entitled for impugned deduction u/s.80P. 4. As rightly submitted by Ld. AR, the delay has been condoned by appropriate authority i.e., Ld. CCIT, Coimbatore vide ITBA/COM/F/17/2023-24/1059670711(1) dated 12-01-2024 allowing assessee’s application u/s.119(2)(b) seeking condonation of delay in filing return of income to claim deduction u/s. 80P r.w.s. 80AC(ii) of the Act. The Ld. Sr. DR could not controvert the said position. This being the case, there is no reason to deny the impugned deduction to the assessee. We direct Ld. AO to allow the impugned addition as claimed by the assessee. 5. The appeal stands allowed. Order pronounced on 29th January, 2024

Sd/- Sd/- (MAHAVIR SINGH) (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) उपा34 / VICE PRESIDENT लेखा सद6 / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

3 ITA No.814/Chny/2023

चे8ई Chennai; िदनांक Dated : 29-01-2024 DS आदेशकीCितिलिपअ%ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. � थ�/Respondent 3. आयकरआयु@/CIT 4. िवभागीय�ितिनिध/DR 5. गाडEफाईल/GF

BANNARI AMMAN SUGARS EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE THRIFT&CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ERODE vs ITO, WARD 1(1), ERODE | BharatTax