KANNAN YADAV PARTHASARATHI,CHENNAI vs. ITO,NON CORPORATE WARD-10(3), CHENNAI
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI MANJUNATHA. G
आदेश / O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao, Judicial Member: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [NFAC], New Delhi dated 02.05.2023 relevant to the Assessment Year 2017-18.
The appeal filed by the assessee is delayed by 150 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal, for which, the assessee has filed a
I.T.A No.1379/Chny/2023 :- 2 -: petition for condonation of the delay in the form of an affidavit. The Ld.
D.R objected for condoning the delay. We have gone through the
affidavit filed by the assessee and find that there is a sufficient cause
for condoning the delay subject to payment of cost of Rs.2,000/-. The
same shall be paid by the assessee to Tamil Nadu State Legal
Services Authority at Hon’ble High Court of Madras within a period of
one month from the date of receipt of this order and produce the receipt
before the A.O. Accordingly, the delay is condoned and the appeal is
admitted for adjudication on merits.
So far as the merits of the case is concerned, the learned
Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) passed an
ex-parte order on 02.05.2023 and submitted that the assessee could
not appear before the Ld. CIT(A) as the circumstances were beyond his
control. He further prayed that one more opportunity may be given to
the assessee to substantiate his case before the Ld. CIT(A).
On the other hand the learned Departmental Representative has
not raised any objection to the submissions of the learned Counsel for
the assessee.
We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on
record and gone through the orders of the authorities below.
I.T.A No.1379/Chny/2023 :- 3 -:
On perusal of Form 35 by the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A) it is apparent that due to sudden demise of assessee’s guardian, he has sought for one more opportunity towards submission of account and financial statement etc. however, without affording any opportunity, the ld. CIT(A) has passed an exparte appellate order. Therefore, in the interest of natural justice, the assessee shall be given an opportunity for filing accounts and financial statements etc. before the assessing authority. Accordingly, we set aside the order passed by the ld. CIT(A) and remit the matter back to the file of A.O to afford an opportunity of filing accounts and financial statements etc., by considering the same he shall pass the assessment in accordance with law. In view of the above, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 29th January, 2024.
Sd/- Sd/- (�ी मंजूनाथा जी) (वी दुगा� राव) (V. DURGA RAO) (MANJUNATHA. G) लेखा सद�/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER �ाियक सद�/JUDICIAL MEMBER चे�ई/Chennai, �दनांक/Dated: 29th January, 2024. EDN/-
I.T.A No.1379/Chny/2023 :- 4 -: आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ(/Appellant 2. &'थ(/Respondent 3. आयकर आयु1/CIT 4. िवभागीय &ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड� फाईल/GF
