APAX PARTNERS INDIA ADVISERS P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIR 6(1), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as the issues were covered under the APA. The Revenue had no objection. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Assessing Officer giving effect to the DRP's directions. The assessee had entered into an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the CBDT covering the assessment year in question.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn when the issues are covered by an Advance Pricing Agreement. The requirement to withdraw appeals pending before the ITAT when issues are covered under an APA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “K”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & RAM LAL NEGI
The captioned appeal filed by the assessee is arising from the order dated 28.11.2014 passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 giving effect to the directions of Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) dated 07.10.2014.
At the time of hearing, the learned representative for the assessee made a request for permission to withdraw the appeal by referring to letter dated 24.05.2016, which reads as under :-
2 Apax Partners India Advisers Pvt. Ltd.
“We refer to the hearing for captioned appeal scheduled to be heard on 13 June 2016.
In this context, we would like to inform that, the Appellant has entered into an Advance Pricing Agreement (‘APA’) with the Central Board of Direct Taxes (‘CBDT’) on 31 March 2014 and a subsequent Revision to the APA dated 16 March 2016. Pursuant to the same, AY 2010-11 to AY 2018-19 are covered within the APA entered into by the Appellant with the CBDT.
In this regard, Rule 10RA of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 requires the Appellant to withdraw the appeal pending before the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellant Tribunal, in so far as the issue(s) are covered under the APA.
In this regard, we humbly request for withdrawal of Appeal No.-ITA 819/Mum-2015 as it relates to issue(s) which are subject matter of the APA.”
Ld. DR appearing for the Revenue has no objection to the aforesaid plea of assessee.
Accordingly, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
The above decision was pronounced in the open court in the presence of both the parties at the conclusion of hearing on 31.10.2016.
More judgments on Section 144C(1)
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Smartstream Technologies India Private… vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2220/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026