DCIT, MADURAI vs. VTM LIMITED, VIRUDHUNAGAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2353/CHNY/2015Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 November 2016AY 2011-123 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80-IA even with captive consumption of electricity. It also ruled that losses cannot be excluded in light of the Madras High Court judgment.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed against the CIT(Appeals) order allowing deduction under Section 80-IA for a windmill. The Assessing Officer had disallowed the claim because the assessee excluded losses and used generated electricity for captive consumption.

What were the issues?

Whether captive consumption of electricity generated by a windmill disqualifies it for deduction under Section 80-IA, and if losses from the eligible business can be excluded.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80-IA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH

For Respondent: Shri R. Srinivasan, Advocate
Hearing: 17.10.2016Pronounced: 23.11.2016

आदेश /O R D E R

PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

1.

This appeal of the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -1, Madurai, dated 16.10.2015 and pertains to assessment year 2011-12.

2.

We have heard Shri Supriyo Pal, the Ld. Departmental Representative and Shri R. Srinivasan, the Ld.counsel for the assessee. The only issue arises for consideration is deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'). The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of the assessee under Section 80-IA of the Act in respect of windmill on the ground that the assessee excluded loss from the eligible business. The assessee has also used the electricity generated by windmill for captive consumption. On appeal by the assessee, the CIT(Appeals) allowed the claim of the assessee by placing reliance on the judgment of Madras High Court in Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (340 ITR 477).

3.

We have carefully gone through the orders of both the authorities below and the judgment of Madras High Court in Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. (supra). This Tribunal is of the considered opinion that even though the electricity is used for captive consumption, the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80-IA of the Act. Moreover, the loss suffered cannot be excluded in view of the judgment of Madras High Court in Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. (supra). Therefore, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the lower authority and accordingly the same is confirmed.

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.

Order pronounced on 23rd November, 2016 at Chennai.

More judgments on Section 80-IA

All 612 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80-IA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →