SANJAY KUMAR,GREATER NOIDA vs. ITO, WARD- 3(3), NOIDA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4412/DEL/2017Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 February 2018AY 2008-093 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate their case with evidence. The assessee was directed to appear before the AO and provide a copy of the order.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed a return of income, but due to non-appearance, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment ex-parte. The CIT(A) also dismissed the assessee's appeal for non-prosecution.

What were the issues?

Whether the ex-parte assessment and dismissal of appeal by lower authorities were justified, and if the assessee should be granted a final opportunity to present their case.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144,Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “SMC”, NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA

For Appellant: Shri B. R. Mishra, Sr.DR

O R D E R

PER R. K. PANDA, AM :

1.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 30.05.2017 of CIT(A)- I, Noida relating to assessment year 2008-09.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of hearing. Therefore, the appeal is being decided on the basis of material available on record and after hearing the ld. DR. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual and filed his return of income on 30.09.2008 declaring total income of Rs.9,67,174/-. Since there was no appearance despite service of statutory notice, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 determining the total income at Rs.17,36,174/-.

4.

Since there was non-compliance before the ld. CIT(A) also he dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee holding that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal and no purpose is served by keeping the appeal pending.

5.

Aggrieved with such order of the ld. CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.

6.

After considering the statement of facts mentioned in the appeal memo and considering the fact that ex-parte order has been passed by the Assessing Officer and the ld. CIT(A), I, in the interest of justice, deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate his case with evidence to his satisfaction regarding the return of income filed. The assessee is also hereby directed to appear before the Assessing Officer and file a copy of this order within 30 days from the date of receipt of the same with request to him to issue statutory notices as per law for early completion of the assessment. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes.

7.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on this 27th February, 2018.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →