ITO, WARD- 23(4), NEW DELHI vs. SIMCO INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA PVT. LTD., DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018 directs the Department not to file appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 20 lakhs. The Revenue's appeal was therefore not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 45 lakhs made under Section 68. The tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs. 20 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable given the tax effect and CBDT circular instructions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘C+SMC’, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
ITA.No.434/Del/2018 Assessment Year 2010-2011 M/s. SIMCO Infrastructure India Income Tax Officer, Pvt. Ltd., (Earlier known as Ward-23(4), Room vs. M/submitted that Champa No.246, CR Building, Commercial Pvt. Ltd.,), B-68, I.P. Estate, New Delhi . Surajmal Vihar, Delhi – 110 092. PAN ACWFS0378R APPELLANT RESPONDENT Revenue by : Sh. Vijay Kumar Jiwani, Sr. DR Assessee by : Sh. Shailesh Gupta, C.A. & Sh. P.C. Yadav, Advocate. Date of Hearing : 09.08.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 09.08.2018 ORDER
PER BHAVNESH SAINI, JM
This appeal by the Revenue has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-2, New Delhi, dated 20.10.2017, for 2 ITA.No.434/Del./2018 M/s. SIMCO Infrastructure India Pvt. Ltd., Delhi.
Assessment Year 2010-2011, challenging the deletion of addition of Rs.45 lakhs under section 68 of the I.T. Act, 1961.
Admittedly, the tax effect in the Departmental Appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs. Vide Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by CBDT under section 268A of the I.T. Act, it has been directed that Department shall not file appeal before the Tribunal in case where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.20 lakhs. It is also directed that this instruction will apply retrospectively to the pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in the Tribunal. Pending appeals below the specified tax effect may be withdrawn/not pressed. Learned Sr. D.R. in view of the above Board Circular did not press the Departmental Appeal. We may also note that the Appeal of the Department above would not fall within the exceptions provided in the Board Circular. In the result, the Departmental Appeal is not maintainable as have been filed against the instruction of the Board. The 3 ITA.No.434/Del./2018 M/s. SIMCO Infrastructure India Pvt. Ltd., Delhi.
Departmental Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed by the Learned Sr. D.R.
In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026