FV114 VPM DIST COOP DEPT AND COOP AUDIT DEPT EMP COOP T AND C SOCIETY,VILLUPURAM vs. ADDL(OR)JCIT(A), MUMUBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to dismiss the appeal in limini. The assessee's explanation for the delay was not accepted as reasonable, especially since the intimation order was sent to their declared email ID.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) with an inordinate delay of 912 days. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal in limini, holding that there was no bonafide reason or reasonable cause explained for the delay.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned. The assessee's claim of not receiving the order was contested.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ /SMC BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE-
: Mr. G.Reddi Prakash, C.A. अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant by : Mr. D.Hema Bhupal, JCIT ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent by 21.02.2024 : सुनवाईक"तार"ख/Date of hearing 21.02.2024 : घोषणाक"तार"ख /Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R This appeal filed by the assessee is arising out of order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi vide appeal No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2023-24 / 1057404962(1) dated 26.10.2023. The impugned intimation u/s.143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) was passed by order dated 17.12.2020 for the relevant assessment year 2019-20 by the CPC., Bengaluru, by disallowing expenses amounting to Rs.6,39,452/-.
At the outset, learned counsel for the assessee stated that the Ld.CIT(A) has not admitted the appeal and dismissed 2 appeal in limini, by holding that there is no bonafide on the part of the assessee and no reasonable cause has explained for inordinate delay of 912 days in filing of the appeal before the CIT(A). Since there was no proper justification for the delay, the CIT(A) dismissed appeal in limini.
Aggrieved, now, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal for condoning the delay and remanding the matter back to the file of CIT(A) for deciding the matter on merits. The assessee before the CIT(A) filed an appeal with delay of 912 days and in his condonation petition, assessee has requested as under:- “The assessee has not received any order copy through post or any other mode, while visiting Auditor Office for filing current year return, we came to know that order has been passed and the demand has been raised. Kindly send hard copy of communication to us. Thus, we request you to condone the delay.”
The Ld.CIT(A) noted that intimation order u/s.143(1) of the Act by the CPC, Bengaluru, was sent to e-mail ID of the assessee at vpmcoopdeptsociety@gmail.com, which is the e- mail ID declared by the assessee on 17.12.2020. When it was pointed out to the learned counsel, he could not answer 3 anything, rather he stated that in the interest of substantial justice delay may be condoned, because under dispute is 80P deduction which cannot be a subject matter of franchise adjustment u/s.143(1) of the Act. On the other hand, Ld. Sr. DR objected to condonation of delay.
After hearing both the sides and going through facts and circumstances of the case, even now before me, the assessee could not explain the delay with any reasonable cause. This being inordinate delay of 912 days and the explanation given by the assessee that it has not received the order, was already negated by the CIT(A) by giving proof that processing of return u/s.143(1) by CPC has already been sent to assessee’s e- mail ID vpmcoopdeptsociety@gmail.com. and hence, delay is not condoned and action of the Ld.CIT(A) is upheld.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026