PARIVALLAL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ADDL DIT, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CIT (Exemptions) had subsequently granted registration under Section 12AA of the Act. Consequently, the pending appeals became infructuous.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against orders of the Director of Income Tax (Exemptions). The appeals were heard together as they involved common issues.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals are infructuous due to subsequent grant of registration under Section 12AA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
M/s. Parivallal Educational Trust The Director of Income Tax C/o Sh. S. Sridhar, Advocate, v. (Exemptions), & New No.14, Old No.82, Flat No.5, The Additional Director of Income 1st Avenue, Indira Nagar, Tax (Exemptions) Chennai. Adyar, Chennai – 600 020. PAN : AAATP0578Q (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/Appellant by : Sh. S. Sridhar, Advocate ��यथ� क� ओर से/Respondent by : Sh. V. Anjaneyalu, CIT सुनवाई क� तारीख/Date of Hearing : 01.12.2016 घोषणा क� तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 01.12.2016 आदेश आदेश /O R D E R आदेश आदेश PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER: These appeals of the assessee are directed against the order of the Director of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chennai, dated 28.02.2014 & 10.12.2007 and pertains to Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
Both the appeals of the assessee are directed against the respective order of the DIT (Exemptions). Since, common issues arise in both the appeals, we heard the same together and disposing of the same by this common order.
When the appeals were taken up for hearing Sh. S. Sridhar, Ld. counsel for the assessee, submitted that the CIT (Exemptions) by an order dated 28.10.2016 granted registration under Section 12AA of the Act with effect from 13.06.2007. In view of this order of the CIT (Exemptions), both the appeals of the assessee become infructuous. Shri V. Anjaneyalu, the Ld. Departmental Representative has no objection to dismiss both the appeals as infructuous. 4. In view of the above, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as infructuous. Order pronounced in the open court on 1st December, 2016 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026