CENTRAL RAILWAY EMPLOYEE CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 17(3)4), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee was not properly heard as the appeal was adjourned and a fresh notice was to be issued, but an order was passed the next day. Therefore, the CIT(A) was directed to adjudicate the appeal afresh on merits, providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard and furnish evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee society claimed credit for tax deducted at source on interest amounting to Rs. 6,08,426/-. The CIT(A) rejected this claim by passing an ex-parte order.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without affording the assessee a proper opportunity of being heard, violating principles of natural justice.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES, ‘C’ MUMBAI
Before: Shri Joginder Singh, & Shri Rajesh Kumar
28/11/2016 सुनवाई क� तार�ख / Date of Hearing : 02/12/2016 आदेश क� तार�ख /Date of Order:
2 Central Railway Employee Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. आदेश / O R D E R Per Joginder Singh (Judicial Member) The assessee is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 16/07/2008 of the Ld. First Appellate Authority, Mumbai, on rejection of claim of the assessee society for grant of credit for tax deducted at source from interest amounting to Rs.6,08,426/- by passing an ex-party order by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal).
During hearing of this appeal, the ld. counsel for the assessee, Shri Deepak Tikekar, filed a photocopy of letter showing that on the appointed date of hearing i.e. 10/04/2008, the assessee was directed that the appeal has been adjourned and fresh notice of hearing will be issued. This letter also bearing the seal of the office the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) along with signature. This factual matrix was not controverted by the ld. DR, Ms. Mahua Sarkar. 2.1. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. Without going into much deliberation/merits of the appeal, as canvassed by ld. counsel for the assessee, we find that there is a noting on the photocopy that ‘Adj. and fresh notice will be issued’, which is duly bearing the seal and signature from the office of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal). The order was passed on the next day itself i.e. 11/04/2008, meaning thereby, the principle of natural justice demands that no person should be condemned unheard, therefore, we direct the Ld. 3 Central Railway Employee Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) to adjudicate the appeal of the assessee afresh on merit. Needless to mention here that the assessee be provided due opportunity of being heard. The assessee is at liberty to furnish necessary evidence, if any, in support of its claim. The assessee is directed to approach the office of the First Appellate Authority within one month from the receipt of this order. The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) is free to adjudicate the appeal of the assessee on a mutually pre decided date. Thus, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only. Finally, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only. This order was pronounced in the open court in the presence of the ld. representatives from both sides at the conclusion of the hearing on 28/11/2016.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026