UNION BANK OF INDIA STAFF CO OP THRIFT CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NON CROP WARD 12(5), CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee, being a cooperative society, is eligible for deduction on dividend income received from a cooperative bank, following Supreme Court and High Court precedents. Therefore, the disallowance made by the lower authorities was incorrect.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for dividend income received from shares held in Chennai Central Co-operative Bank. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) disallowed this claim, stating that a cooperative bank is not a cooperative society for the purpose of deduction.
What were the issues?
Whether dividend income received by a cooperative society from a cooperative bank is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, especially in light of Section 80P(4).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT999 citing123 Taxmann.com 161 · 2021 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ (SMC
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH
आयकर अपील सं./ 2017-2018 Union Bank of India Staff Co-op Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Thrift and Credit Society Non Corporate Ward 12(5) Limited, Chennai. 16A, 3rd floor, Singapore Plaza, Linghi Chetty Street, George Town, Chennai 600 001. [PAN AAAAU 2933K] (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/ Appellant by : Ms Ashwini Vaidialingam, Adv ��यथ� क� ओर से /Respondent by : Shri D. Hema Bhupal, IRS, JCIT सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing : 22.02.2024 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement : 22.02.2024 आदेश/ O R D E R This appeal by assessee is arising out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, 09.08.2023. The assessment was framed by the Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward 12 (5), Chennai for the assessment year 2017-2018, u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘’the Act’) vide order dated 23.12.2019.
:- 2 -: The only issue in this appeal of the assessee is with regard to 2. order of the CIT(A) in confirming the action of the ld. Assessing Officer in disallowing the claim of deduction u/s.80P(2) (a)(i) of the Act in regard to dividend received from shares held in Chennai Central Co-operative Bank. For this, assessee has raised various grounds, which are argumentative and factual and need not be reproduced.
Brief facts of the case are that assessee is a Multi-State 3. Cooperative Society, registered under the Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2012 at Chennai. The members of the assessee’s society are all employees of Union Bank of India. Assessee extends credit facilities like surety loans, festival loans, calamity loans etc to its members. Assessee society does not provide any banking facility to its members or general public. For this assessment year 2017-2018, assessee filed its return of income claiming deduction u/s.80P(2) (a) (i) of the Act for an amount of Rs.3,77,800/- received as dividend from shares held in Chennai Central Co-operative Bank. The ld. Assessing Officer while framing the assessment noted that assessee received dividend from shares held in Chennai Central Co-operative Bank under Companies Act on dividend distribution tax u/s.115 O of the Act. According to the ld. Assessing Officer, Chennai Central Co-operative Bank is a bank and hence the assessee’s claim of deduction u/s.80P(2) (a)(i) of the Act is not allowable :- 3 -: and accordingly he made addition. Aggrieved, assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(A).
The ld. CIT(A) also upheld the action of the ld. Assessing Officer by observing that Chennai Central Co-operative Bank is not a society. For this the ld. CIT(A) recorded the following findings. ‘’(xiv) Further, in light of the multiple judgments of Hon'ble SC as well as judgments of various High Courts, including recent judgment of Gujarat High Court, it is clear that after insertion of Sec. 80P(4), deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) has been limited to interest / dividend received from other cooperative societies only, and not Cooperative Banks (Other than PACS or Primary co-operative Agricultural and rural development bank). Therefore, it is clear that a co- operative bank is an urban commercial bank and does not fall under the purview of a "Co-operative Society" referred in section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and as such, the interest/dividend income earned from such co- operative bank is not allowable for the said deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act’’. Aggrieved, assessee preferred an appeal before the Tribunal.
I have heard rival contentions and gone through the facts and circumstances of the case. Admittedly, the assessee is a Multi-State Cooperative Society, registered under the Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2012 at Chennai. The members of the assessee’s society are all employees of Union Bank of India. Assessee extends credit facilities like surety loans, festival loans, calamity loans etc to its members. Assessee received Rs.3,77,800/- as dividend from shares held in Chennai Central Co-operative Bank. Chennai Central Co-operative Bank is registered under Tamil Nadu State Co-operative Act and once it is registered under Tamil Nadu State Co-operative Act assessee is as such eligible for deduction. Since the assessee is a Co-operative Society and it has received dividend :- 4 -: Chennai Central Co-operative Bank, the same is eligible for claim of deduction in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., & Ors. Vs. CIT, 123 Taxmann.com 161 (SC). Similar view has been taken by the Tribunal in the case of Tamilnadu Co-operative State Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Limited in to 33/CHNY/2021 vide order dated 29.04.2022 following the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., supra and the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case S-1308, Ammapet Primary Agricultural Co- operative Bank Ltd.,in T.C.A Nos.882 and 891 of 2018. Respectfully following the same, I allow the claim of deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. 6. In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No.1131/Chny/2023 for assessment 2017-2018 stands allowed.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- The Development Multipurpose Credit &… vs ITO Ward 2 (4), Porbandar, GujaratITA 458/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hislop College Employees Cooperative Credit… vs ITO Ward 2(3), NagpurITA 184/NAG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026