No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘ए, �यायपीठ, चे�ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI �ी महावीर �सह,उपा�य� एवं �ी मनोज कुमार अ�वाल,लेखा सद�य के सम� BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.1332/CHNY/2023 िनधा�रण वष� /Assessment Year:2017-2018 Shri Venkatesan, The Income Tax Officer, No.T/D 122, Koyambedu, v. Non Corporate Ward 8(1) Chennai 600092. Chennai. PAN: AADPV 2269F (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/Appellant by : Shri G. Baskar, Advocate ��यथ� क� ओर से/Respondent by : Shri ARV Sreenivasan, IRS, Addl. CIT. सुनवाई क� तारीख/Date of Hearing : 12.03.2024 घोषणा क� तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 12.03.2024 आदेश /O R D E R PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VP:
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1057134219 (1) dated 17.10.2023. The assessment was framed by the Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/ Income-tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi u/s.147 r.w.s. 144 of the
ITA No.1332/Chny /2023 2 Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’) for the assessment year 2017-18 vide order dated 29.03.2022.
Brief facts of the case are that assessee is an individual engaged in business of wholesale trading in vegetable and fruits. As per the information received in insight portal under the category ’’CRIU/VRU High risk cases, it was found that assessee had made cash deposits of Rs.2,77,93,600/-. A notice u/s.148 of the Act was issued on 29.03.2021. However, assessee did not file return of income in response to notice issued u/s.148 of the Act. As assessee failed to file the return of income, the ld. Assessing Officer added a sum of Rs.2,77,93,600/- as unexplained money u/s.69A of the Act to the total income of the assessee. Aggrieved, assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(A).
The CIT(A) also confirmed the action of the AO for the reason that the assessee has not filed any reply to the notices issued. Aggrieved, assessee preferred an appeal before us.
Now before us, the ld.counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessment was framed ex-parte and best judgment assessment u/s.144 of the Act for assessing the cash deposits made by assessee amounting to
ITA No.1332/Chny /2023 3 Rs.2,77,93,600/- and he requested to setting aside the appeal to the file of the ld. Assessing Officer.
When these facts were confronted to ld. Senior Departmental Representative, he objected to setting aside of this appeal to the file of the Assessing Officer for the reason that the AO as well as CIT(A) has provided many opportunities but the assessee did not avail for the reasons best known to him.
We have heard rival contentions and gone through facts and circumstances of the case. We noted that the assessee was provided many opportunities by both the authorities below but assessee did not avail the opportunities but in the interest of natural justice, we are of the view that to do substantial justice one more opportunity be provided to the assessee to represent the true and clear facts before the AO and hence, we set aside the orders of the lower authorities i.e., the AO and the CIT(A) and remand the matter back to the file of the AO with a cost of Rs.25,000/- to be paid to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority at Hon’ble High Court of Madras on or before 26.04.2024. The assessee will pay this cost and produce the receipt before the AO. In term of the above, the orders of the lower authorities are set aside and matter restored back to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication. Needless to say that the AO will allow reasonable opportunity of being heard
ITA No.1332/Chny /2023 4 to the assessee and assessee is also directed to represent his case as and when notice is issued, otherwise adverse view can be taken against the assessee. 7. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing on 12th March, 2024 at Chennai.
Sd/- Sd/- (महावीर �सह ) (मनोज कुमार अ�वाल) (MAHAVIR SINGH) (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) उपा�य� /VICE PRESIDENT लेखा सद�य /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER चे�ई/Chennai, �दनांक/Dated, the 12th March, 2024 KV आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��यथ�/Respondent 3. आयकर आयु� /CIT 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड� फाईल/GF.