SHREE GANESH TRACTOR,SEHORE vs. I.T.O. WARD 1, SEHORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 312/IND/2023Status: DisposedITAT Indore02 April 2024AY 2014-15Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO (Judicial Member), SHRI B.M. BIYANI (Accountant Member)5 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal observed that the AO passed an ex-parte order due to the assessee's non-appearance, and the CIT(A) sustained additions without proper verification. Considering the audited books of account and the assessee's claim of true and correct results, the matter requires fresh examination.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a partnership firm dealing in tractors and spare parts, filed its return of income based on audited books of account. The Assessing Officer (AO) passed an ex-parte order, making additions on account of estimated Gross Profit and disallowance of expenses, as the assessee claimed non-receipt of notices. The CIT(A) sustained these additions.

What were the issues?

Whether the ex-parte assessment order and subsequent additions made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) are valid when the assessee claims non-receipt of notices and the existence of audited books of account.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144,Section 44AB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE

For Appellant: Shri S.S. Deshpande, AR
For Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR
Hearing: 01.04.2024Pronounced: 02.04.2024

This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order dated 19.06.2023 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi for A.Y.2014-15. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:

“1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the decision of the learned lower authorities is contrary to law, materially incorrect, and unsustainable in law as well as facts.

ITANo.312/Ind/2023 Shree Ganesh Tractors And that all the adverse findings recorded therein are opposed to facts, equity, and law.

2.

That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the initiation of proceedings u / s * 0.147 of the IT Act is without jurisdiction and the issue of notice do not satisfy the judicial requirements of the law and, therefore, the assessment is bad in law and without jurisdiction hence the same be kindly cancelled.

3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned lower authorities erred in their findings and not justified in rejecting the books of accounts of the appellant without providing reasonable opportunity and, therefore, the said unlawful and unjustified order be quashed and relief to be provided to appellant.

4.

That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned lower authorities erred in their findings and the estimating the sales at Rs. 13,00,00,000/- and Gross Profit @ 3.60 % and therefore, the said unlawful and unjustified order be quashed and relief to be provided to appellant for addition to gross profit to the tune of Rs. 17,49,945/-.

5. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, F the learned lower authorities erred in their findings, and the lump sum disallowance of 20% of the expenses claimed is ITANo.312/Ind/2023 Shree Ganesh Tractors bad in law and therefore the said unjustified and unlawful addition of Rs. 13,58,320/- be deleted.

6.

That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned lower authorities erred in their findings in making the addition on account of capital balance without providing reasonable opportunity and, therefore, the said unlawful and unjustified order be quashed and relief to be provided to appellant for Rs. 11,54,021/-.

7.

The Assessee may kindly be allow to raise additional grounds either before or at the time of hearing of this appeal.”

2. Ld. AR of the assesse has submitted that the assesse is a partnership firm deriving income from the business of trading in tractors and spare parts. The assessee is maintaining regular books of account which are duly audited. The assessee filed return of income along with tax audit report u/s 44AB of the Act declaring total income of Rs.4,91,082/-. Ld. AR has submitted that the AO has passed ex-parte order u/s 144 and thereby made the addition on account of adoption of GP rate and thereafter on adhoc disallowance expenses @ 20%. He has pointed out that the assessee did not receive alleged notice issued by the AO therefore, assessee could not participate in the assessment proceedings resulting ex- parte order. The AO has made addition by adopting GP rate as well as adhoc disallowance of expenses which is highly arbitrary and unjustified. He has contended that when the assessee is Page 3 of 5 ITANo.312/Ind/2023 Shree Ganesh Tractors maintaining proper books of account which are duly audited then the income declared by the assessee cannot be disturb until and unless some defect is found by the AO. Since notices were not received by the assessee therefore, there was no appearance before the AO but the assesse has declared true and correct results as per books of account maintained by him. Thus the Ld. AR submitted that the addition made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) are not sustainable. He has prayed that the matter may be set aside to the record of the AO for fresh adjudication.

3.

On the other hand, Ld. DR has not seriously objected if the matter is remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication.

4. We have considered rival submission as well as relevant material on record. The AO has passed ex-parte assessment order when there was no response on behalf of the assessee to the alleged notices issued by the AO. The AO has adopted GP at 3.60% and thereby made an addition of Rs.17,49,945/-. The AO then also disallowed 20% of the expenses on adhoc basis and then made the addition of Rs.13,58,320/-. Further the AO has also made addition of Rs.11,54,021/- on account of remuneration and interest paid to the partners. The assessee has explained that due to lack of service of the notices the assessee could not appear before the AO and filed the submission before the CIT(A) in support of the return income however, the CIT(A) has sustained the additions made by the AO on the ground that the assessee has failed to produce books of account as well as other relevant record for verification of the AO.

ITANo.312/Ind/2023 Shree Ganesh Tractors Accordingly we are of the view that when the books of account of the assessee are audited and income declared by the assessee is claimed as based on the true and correct result of books of account then the matter requires a proper verification and examination at the level of the AO. Hence, in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice the impugned order of the CIT(A) is set aside and matter is remanded to the record of the AO for proper verification and examination of the relevant record as well as books of account of the assessee and then passed a fresh order after giving appropriate opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

5.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 02.04.2024.

More judgments on Section 44AB

All 2,486 judgments and leading authorities on Section 44AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →