RAJBIR SINGH ,PANIPAT vs. ITO WARD-1 PANIPAT, PANIPAT

PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2013-14, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National
Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1075702140(1), dated
21.04.2025 involving proceedings under section 147 r.w.s 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
Assessee by None
Department by Sh. Manish Gupta, Sr. DR
Date of hearing
20.11.2025
Date of pronouncement
20.11.2025
2 | P a g e

Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. He is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.
2. It emerges during the course of hearing with the able assistance coming from the Revenue side that the learned
CIT(A)/NFAC has refused to condone the delay of 314 in filing of the assessee’s lower appeal instituted on 25.04.2024 against the Assessing Officer’s assessment framed on 17.05.2023 thereby holding that the same had not been explained in light of the justifiable reasons.
3. Faced with the situation, learned departmental representative could hardly dispute that the assessee had indeed filed his condonation petition before the CIT(A)/NFAC explaining all the reasons on account of circumstances beyond his control.
4. That being the case, we hereby quote Collector, Land &
Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Others (1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC), settling the issue long back that all such technical aspects must make way for the cause of substantial justice, and restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the Assessing Officer for his afresh appropriate adjudication within three effective opportunities subject to a rider that the taxpayer shall plead and prove the case
3 | P a g e at his own risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings.
Ordered accordingly.
5. This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 20th November, 2025 (MANISH AGARWAL)
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated: 24th November, 2025. RK/-