← Back to search

GURBAKSHISH SINGH BATRA,DELHI vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-52(1), DELHI

PDF
ITA 3991/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 November 20253 pages

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANISH AGARWALAssessment Year: 2016-17 Gurbakshish Singh Batra, E-1511, Wazir Nagar, Kotla, Mubarakpur, Delhi Vs. ACIT, Circle-52(1), Delhi PAN :ADSPB2480J (Appellant)

PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2016-17, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National
Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1076512196(1), dated
28.05.2025 involving proceedings under section 144 r.w.s. 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
Assessee by Sh. Rajiv Jain, CA
Department by Ms. Rajinder Kaur, CIT(DR)
Date of hearing
20.11.2025
Date of pronouncement
20.11.2025
2 | P a g e

2.

It transpires during the course of hearing that there is hardly any need to delve with the relevant factual matrix at length in the assessee’s appeal. This is for the precise reason that the assessing authority has framed the impugned assessment dated 30th March, 2022 in compliance to the learned PCIT’s section 263 revision directions dated 22nd March, 2021 terming the former assessment completed on 28.11.2018 as an erroneous one causing prejudice to the interest of the Revenue. 3. It is in this factual backdrop that the assessee has invited our attention to the learned coordinate bench’s order in his appeal ITA No.396/Del/2021 decided on 31st March, 2022 against the department thereby annulling the PCIT’s foregoing revision directions itself. We thus conclude that the impugned consequential assessment has no legs to stand once the learned PCIT’s revision direction already quashed. We thus conclude that the impugned latter assessment dated 30.03.2022 must also follow the suit in very terms. Ordered accordingly.

All other pleadings on merits between the parties stand rendered academic.
4. This assessee’s appeal is allowed.
3 | P a g e

Order pronounced in the open court on 20th November, 2025 (MANISH AGARWAL)
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated: 3rd December, 2025. RK/-

GURBAKSHISH SINGH BATRA,DELHI vs ACIT,CIRCLE-52(1), DELHI | BharatTax