No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM & HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘सी’ �ायपीठ चे�ई म�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ/वाल ,लेखा सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनु कुमार िग7र, �ाियक सद3 के सम8। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM आयकरअपील सं./ (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2013-14) M/s. G.E.T. Water Solutions Pvt. Ltd. ACIT बनाम/ Vs. C-24, Thiru-Vi-Ka Industrial Estate, Corporate Circle-2(1) Guindy, Chennai-600 032. Chennai. �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AABCN-1835-E (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (� थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ� कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri N.V. Krishnan (Advocate)- Ld.AR � थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT)-Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 16-04-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 16-04-2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
Aggrieved by confirmation of certain additions / disallowances for Assessment Year (AY) 2013-14, the assessee is in further appeal before us. At the time of hearing, Ld. AR submitted that appeal has been dismissed by first appellate authority for want of condonation of delay of 224 days. The Ld. AR submitted that appeal was filed manually on 21- 04-2016 which was within time. The Ld. CIT(A) issued a letter on 24-11- 2016 directing the assessee to e-file the appeal as per extant procedure.
The assessee e-filed the same on 09-12-2016 but still the appeal was dismissed on delay.
The registry has noted delay of 19 days in the appeal, the condonation of which has been sought by the Ld. AR on the strength of an affidavit of director of the assessee. Considering the period of delay, the delay is condoned and we proceed to adjudicate the appeal.
W concur with the submissions of Ld. AR that manual appeal was filed within time and the assessee also complied with the directions of Ld. CIT(A). Therefore, the appeal should not have been dismissed on delay. Nevertheless, we set aside the impugned order and restore the appeal back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for de novo adjudication on merits with a direction to the assessee to substantiate its case. A reasonable opportunity of hearing shall be granted to the assessee.
The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 16th April, 2024.