MR. SANDEEP DOSHI,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORP. CIRCLE 3(1), CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed the AO to verify the submitted Form No. 4 and revise the computations accordingly. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
What were the facts?
The assessee made a declaration under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016. The CIT(A) denied immunity, stating that Form No. 4 was not submitted. However, the assessee later produced Form No. 4 with tax payment details.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is entitled to immunity under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, when Form No. 4 was initially not produced but later submitted with tax payment details.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM & HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘सी’ �ायपीठ चे�ई म�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ/वाल ,लेखा सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनु कुमार िग7र, �ाियक सद3 के सम8। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM आयकरअपील सं./ (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Shri Sandeep Doshi DCIT Plot No.6, Old No.5/1 Corporate Circle-3(1), बनाम/ Vs. New Door No.13-15, Harleys Road, Chennai. Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AOCPS-4754-H (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (� थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ� कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri D. Anand (Advocate)-Ld.AR � थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT)-Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 17-04-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 17-04-2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 06-12-2023 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s.147 r.w.s 144 of the Act on 29-03-2022. In the assessment order, the assessee made addition of Rs.12.96 Lacs. During appellate proceedings, the assessee submitted that it made declaration under Income Declaration Scheme, 2016. However, Ld. CIT(A) held that without Form No.4, it could not be said that the declaration was accepted. Therefore, no such immunity would be available to the assessee.
The Ld. AR placed on record copy of Form No.4 which bears the details of payment of taxes also. Since this form is now available, the Ld. AO is directed to verify the same and revise the computations accordingly. 3. The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in open court on 17th April, 2024.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026