AERO WORLD TRAVELS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CORPORTE WARD-1(1), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal, considering the principle of natural justice, granted the assessee another opportunity to substantiate its case. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerns the confirmation of an addition of Rs. 69.34 Lacs as cash deposit. The assessee failed to provide necessary details during assessment and appellate proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to provide details for substantiating cash deposits, despite previous negligence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM & HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘सी’ �ायपीठ चे�ई म�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ/वाल ,लेखा सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनु कुमार िग7र, �ाियक सद3 के सम8। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM आयकरअपील सं./ (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Aero World Travels India Private Ltd. ITO बनाम/ Vs. 231, Anna Salai, Corporate Ward-1(1), Mount Road, Chennai-600 002. Chennai. �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AADCA-3247-M (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (� थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ� कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri G. Tarun (Advocate)-Ld.AR � थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT)-Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 17-04-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 17-04-2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 21-11-2023 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 143(3) of the Act on 13-12-2019. The assessee is aggrieved by confirmation of addition of cash deposit of Rs.69.34 Lacs. The assessee failed to file requisite details during assessment proceedings. The position remained the same during first appellate proceedings and accordingly, the assessment was confirmed. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. The Ld. AR has pleaded for another opportunity of hearing before lower authorities which has been opposed by Ld. Sr. DR.
Though the assessee has remained negligent, however, keeping in mind the principle of natural justice, we deem it fit to grant another opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for de novo adjudication with a direction to the assessee to substantiate its case forthwith without fail. A reasonable opportunity of hearing shall be granted to the assessee. 3. The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in open court on 17th April, 2024.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026