SRI AYYASAMY THIRUKOVIL TRUST,COIMBATORE vs. ITO, NON CORP. WARD 4(1),COIMBATORE, COIMBATORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and, considering the principle of natural justice, set aside the CIT(E)'s order. The matter was restored to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration after providing the assessee an opportunity to present its case and supply necessary information.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust filed an application for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) which was rejected by the CIT(E) for failure to provide requisite details. The assessee appealed this rejection.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the application for registration without affording a proper opportunity to the assessee to furnish details. Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “सी” �ायपीठ चे�ई म�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय �ी एस. एस. िव�ने� रिव, �ाियक सद! एवं माननीय �ी मनोज कुमार अ&वाल ,लेखा सद! के सम(। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपील सं./ Sri Ayyasamy Thirukovil Trust ITO बनाम No.2/29, Ayyasamy Kovil Street Non-Corporate Ward -1(4) Jagirnaickenpalayam Coimbatore / Vs. Coimbatore – 641 109 �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AARTS-6696-K (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (� थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ�कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri S.Sridhar (Advocate) Erode -Ld. AR � थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (CIT)- Ld. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 02-05-2024 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 07-05-2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
Aggrieved by rejection of an application filed in Form No.10AB seeking registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) vide impugned order dated 15.03.2023, the assessee is in further appeal before us. Upon perusal of para-6 of order, it could be seen that the application has been rejected since the assessee failed to file the requisite details. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. The Ld. AR has sought another opportunity of hearing which has been opposed by Ld. CIT-DR.
The registry has noted delay of 243 days in the appeal, the condonation of which has been sought by Ld. AR on the strength of affidavit of Managing Trustee. It has been submitted that Managing Trustee was not aware of the relevant provisions and the representative who handled the Income Tax Matters expired in 2022. Considering the same, we condone the delay and proceed for disposal of appeal on merits.
Though the assessee has remained negligent, however, keeping in mind the principle of natural justice, we deem it fit to grant another opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case. Therefore, we set aside the impugned order and restore the matter back to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for de novo consideration of the application after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is directed to substantiate its case and supply the requisite information. 4. The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 7th May, 2024 Sd/- Sd/- (S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) �ाियक सद! / JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद! / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER चे3ई Chennai; िदनांक Dated : 07-05-2024 DS आदेशकीQितिलिपअ&ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. � थ�/Respondent 3. आयकरआयु</CIT 4. िवभागीय�ितिनिध/DR 5. गाडAफाईल/GF
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- D vs Welfare Foundation, Thanevs.Income Tax…ITA 6191/MUM/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026