TN APEX SKILL DEVELOPMENT CENTRE FOR LOGISTICS,CHENNAI vs CIT(EXEMPTION), CHENNAI

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “ए” �ायपीठ चे�ई म�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय �ी महावीर िसंह, उपा�� एवं माननीय �ी मनोज कुमार अ�वाल ,लेखा सद� के सम�। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ ITA No.719/Chny/2024 M/s. TN Apex Skill Development CIT(Exemptions) Centre for Logistics Chennai. बनाम/ Vs. Government ITI Campus, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032. �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAHCT-9797-R (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (��थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ� कीओर से/ Appellant by : Shri A.V. Balaji, (CA)– Ld.AR ��थ� की ओर से/Respondent by : Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT)-Ld. CIT. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 21-05-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 21-05-2024 आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH

Aggrieved by rejection of an application filed in Form No.10AB seeking registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iv) by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) vide impugned order dated 25-01-2023, the assessee is in further appeal before us. 2. The Registry has noted delay of 356 days in appeal, the condonation of which has been sought by Ld. AR on strength of affidavit of Managing Director. It has been submitted that e-filing portal was not accessed and the email marked for correspondence was unknown to the

assessee. Considering the fact that the assessee is a trust, we condone the delay and proceed for disposal of appeal on merits. 3. Upon perusal of para-6 of order, it could be seen that the application has been rejected since the assessee failed to file the requisite details. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. The Ld. AR has sought another opportunity of hearing which has been opposed by Ld. CIT-DR. 4. Though the assessee has remained negligent, however, keeping in mind the principle of natural justice, we deem it fit to grant another opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case. Therefore, we set aside the impugned order and restore the matter back to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for de novo consideration of the application after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is directed to substantiate its case and supply the requisite information. 5. The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 21st May, 2024.

Sd/- Sd/- (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) (MAHAVIR SINGH) लेखा सद� / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER उपा�� / VICE PRESIDENT चे�ई Chennai; िदनांक Dated : 21-05-2024 RSR आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकरआयु�/CIT, Chennai/Coimbatore/Salem/Madurai 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड� फाईल/GF

TN APEX SKILL DEVELOPMENT CENTRE FOR LOGISTICS,CHENNAI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), CHENNAI