WCCG AALAM FOUNDATION,KANCHIPURAM vs. CIT-EXEMPTIONS, CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 785/CHNY/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 May 2024Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi (Judicial Member), Shri Jagadish (Accountant Member)4 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the CIT(E) rejected the application due to a system limitation preventing changes to the declared objects. The assessee was advised to file a fresh application, as per a CBDT circular extending the time limit, to correct the nature of the trust.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed applications for registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G, but mistakenly included 'religious' as an object in Form 10AB, while declaring its nature as a 'Charitable Trust'. The CIT(E) rejected the applications due to this discrepancy and the lack of system functionality to amend the application.

What were the issues?

Whether an application for registration/approval can be rejected due to a clerical error in the form, and if the assessee should be allowed to rectify such an error.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB,Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Before: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadish

Hearing: 22.05.2024Pronounced: 22.05.2024

WCCG Aalam Foundation, Vs. The Commissioner of ASN Oasis No. 250A, 10th Main Road, Income Tax (Exemption), Ram Nagar, Pallikaranai, Medavakkam, Aayakar Bhawan – Annexe Building, Kanchipuram 600 100. No. 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. [PAN: AAATW6601R] (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��थ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ� की ओर से / Appellant by : Shri B. Ramakrishnan, CA ��थ� की ओर से/Respondent by : Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of hearing : 22.05.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 22.05.2024 आदेश /O R D E R PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER: Both the appeals by the assessee are directed against separate orders both dated 25.01.2024 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai in rejecting Form No. 10AB under section 12(1)(AC)(iii) seeking registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short] in as well as rejecting Form No. 10AB towards seeking approval under clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act in ITA No. 786/Chny/2024.

2.

The assessee has filed on-line applications on 12.07.2023 in Form No. 10AB under section 12(1)(AC)(iii) seeking registration under section 12AB of the Act as well as seeking approval under section 80G of the Act. The ld. CIT(E) issued a letter dated 15.12.2023 requesting the assessee to furnish certain certified copies of documents including Note on activities and annual accounts/financial statements of the institution. On perusal of the details furnished by the assessee, the ld. CIT(E) has noted in Form 10AB that one of the objects of the assessee in Column 5 is religious, whereas, in Column 3 the assessee has declared the nature of activities as “Charitable Trust. As the assessee cannot apply for seeking registration of Charitable Trust with religious objects, the assessee was asked to show-cause as to why its application dated 12.07.2023 in Form No. 10AB should not be rejected. In response to the above show-cause notice, the assessee filed reply on 19.01.2024 explaining that while filing Form 10AB, in Column 5, due to clerical error, they have included “Religious” as one of the objects of the trust and expressed its apology for the mistake and prayed for grant of registration under section 12AB of the Act as well as grant of approval under section 80G of the Act. However, since the processing of application and granting of registration are carried in ITBA and there is no functionality available in the system to change the nature of trust other than applied in the application filed in Form 10AB, the ld. CIT(E) has rejected the application of the assessee in seeking registration under section 12AB of the Act as well as grant of approval under section 80G of the Act.

3.

Heard both parties and perused the material available on record. The ld. AR Shri B. Ramakrishnan, CA has submitted that while filing the application in Form 10AB in Column 5, due to clerical error, the assessee has included “Religious” as one of the objects of the trust and also submitted that the mistake was not deliberate, without any intention. He further submitted that due to the inadvertent mistake, the assessee trust cannot be deprived of granting registration under section 12AB of the Act as well as grant of approval under section 80G of the Act. The ld. DR Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT has supported the order passed by the ld. CIT(E). We find the reason rendered by the ld. CIT(E) for rejecting Form 10AB for having no functionality to change the objects in the application Form other than applied in the application filed, it that be so, the assessee is at liberty to file new application in terms of CBDT Circular issued extending the time limit upto 30.06.2024, which enables the assessee to change nature of trust as “Charitable Trust”. Thus, the grounds raised by the assessee in both the appeals become infructuous.

4.

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as infructuous. Order pronounced in the open Court on 22nd May, 2024 at Chennai.

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →