NATARAJAN KAMATCHISUNDARAM,MADURAI vs. ACIT NON CORP CIRCLE 2 , MADURAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 636/CHNY/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 May 2024AY 2016-17Bench: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) had not provided specific findings on the assessee's detailed reply submitted during the appellate proceedings. Therefore, to uphold the principles of natural justice, the appeal was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal for AY 2016-17 arose from an assessment order where an addition of Rs. 13,53,786/- was made on account of custom duty paid. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance and dismissed the assessee's appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) properly considered and dealt with the assessee's submissions before dismissing the appeal. The issue revolves around the principle of natural justice and proper adjudication by the appellate authority.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 144B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM & HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM

Hearing: 20.05.2024Pronounced: 29.05.2024

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘बी’ �ायपीठ चे�ई म�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय �ी मनोज कुमार अ�वाल ,लेखा सद� एवं माननीय �ी मनु कुमार िग�र, �ाियक सद� के सम�। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM आयकरअपील सं./ (िनधा�रणवष� / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Natarajan Kamatchisundaram, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of 52/18, INTUC Colony, Income Tax, Bestin Nagar III Cross Street, Non Corporate Circle 2, Bethaniyapuram, Madurai. Madurai 625 016. [PAN: ALEPK 3923B] (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri. G. Baskar, Advocate ��यथ� क� ओर से /Respondent by : Shri. S. Easwar, IRS, JCIT. सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing : 20.05.2024 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement : 29.05.2024 आदेश / O R D E R PER MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)

Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17 arises out of the order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1061009726 (1) of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 15.02.2024 in the matter of assessment order framed by the Ld.AO u/s 147 r.w.s 144B of the Act on 19-03-2022. wherein the AO made an addition of Rs.13,53,786/- on account of custom duty paid.

2.

Brief facts are that the assessee is the proprietor of M/S Sakthi Tooling, Madurai. The unit is manufacturing dies and tools for machinery and providing job work to various industries. Ld.AO framed Assessment order u/s 147 r.w.s 144B of the Act on 19-03-2022 wherein the AO made an addition of Rs.13,53,786/- on account of custom duty paid. During the appellate proceedings assessee has uploaded/submitted detailed reply on 08.10.2023 justifying claim of custom duty paid however, the Ld.CIT(A) upheld the disallowance and dismissed the appeal.

3.

Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has filed/uploaded written submissions on 08.10.2023 but the same was not considered and dealt point wise by the first appeal authority hence prayed for remand back to Ld.CIT(A) for denovo adjudication of appeal.

4.

Per contra, Ld.JCIT-DR Mr. S. Easwar relied upon the orders of lower authorities and pleaded for dismissal of appeal.

5.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We have observed that Ld.CIT(A) while adjudicating appeal has although recorded the reply of the assessee made on 08.10.2023 in its order however, no specific findings has been returned thereon. Therefore, keeping in mind the principle of natural justice, we deem it fit to restored back the appeal to Ld.CIT(A) for denovo adjudication after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is directed to substantiate its case with cogent evidence, if any, forthwith failing which Ld. CIT(A) shall be at liberty to proceed with disposal of appeal on merits.

6.

The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in open court on 29th day of May, 2024

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →