DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT,(EXEMPTIONS) CIRCLE-1(1), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, following the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority and a co-ordinate bench in Jhansi Development Authority, found it appropriate to remit the issue of taxability of DDA under Section 2(15) back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Delhi Development Authority (DDA), a statutory body, was granted registration under Section 12A of the Income-tax Act. The Assessing Officer assessed income, which was upheld by the CIT(A) despite the assessee claiming NIL income. The grounds for appeal included eligibility for exemption, applicability of Section 2(15) proviso, disallowance of expenditure under Section 40A(9), and levy of interest under Section 234B.
What were the issues?
Whether the activities of the Delhi Development Authority are for charitable purposes as per Section 2(15) and eligible for exemption under Sections 11 and 12, and whether certain expenditures are allowable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12A,Section 143(3),Section 2(15),Section 13(8),Section 40A(9),Section 234B,Section 11,Section 12
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- ACIT v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority390 citing449 ITR 1 · 2022 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘B’ BENCH,
Before: MS. MADHUMITA ROY, & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
PER NAVEEN CHANDRA, A.M:-
This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the NFAC, Delhi dated 30.06.2023 for A.Y 2011-12. 2. The grievances of the assessee read as under: [A.Y. 2016-17] Delhi Dev. Authority Vs. ACIT[E]
“1. That on the facts and in circumstances of the case, the order dated 30-12-2018 passed by Assistant Commissioner of Income- tax Exemptions, Circle 1(1) (hereinafter referred to as "Ld. AO"] under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"] and as upheld by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) -40, New Delhi (hereinafter r
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026