OMGURU NIRMAN PRIVATE LIMITED,DEHRADUN vs. CIT(A), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as a prerequisite for pursuing the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal application.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for assessment year 2012-13. Subsequently, the assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and filed the necessary forms under the scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DEHRADUN “SMC” BENCH, DEHRADUN
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI M. BALAGANESH
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2012-13, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1067788850(1), dated 20.08.2024, involving proceedings under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
The assessee appears to have filed his application dated 28.12.2024 for withdrawal of the instant appeal, as under: “SUB: APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL, IN CASE OF OMGURU NIRMAN PRIVATE LIMITED [PAN-AABCO0009R] REF: APPEAL NO. ITA 203/DDN/2024 DATED 23-11-2024; AY 2012- 13 Dear Sir/Mam, With reference to the aforementioned subject, we would like to bring to your kind notice that the assessee has opted for The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (DTVSV) and thus has filed Form 1 prescribed under the said scheme on 16.12.2024. The copy of the said Form 1 has been attached herewith for your perusal. The Scheme has been opted for with the intention to save time in further litigation and for the sake of peace of mind. Further, now we are in receipt of Form 2 as prescribed under the DTVSV, duly signed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax dated 23.12.2024. The copy of the said Form 2 has also been attached herewith for your perusal. As it is a pre-requisite to withdraw any ongoing appeal proceedings to pursue any application under DTVSV, we hereby request you to accept this application for withdrawal of the said appeal before your goodself. You are requested to kindly allow the withdrawal of the subject appeal and oblige.”
Learned departmental representative submits that he has no objection to the instant withdrawal application per se. Ordered accordingly.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Deepali Sharma Legal Heir Of Late Sh. Rakesh Mohan Sharma vs. Assistant Commissioner, CGST Division Connaught Place , Delhi And Anr.Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- Airports Authority Of INDIA vs. The Assistant Commissioner CGST South Extension Division Division-I Delhi East Commissionerate & AnDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Darshan Enterprises vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 29 Oct 2026
- Eih Associated Hotels Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 29 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026