JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD), NUNGAMBAKKAM CHENNAI vs. AIRCEL CELLULAR LTD, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order regarding verification and modified it to direct the AO to verify the assessee's claims of double disallowance and TDS credit. The AO is to provide an opportunity to the assessee for reconciliation and verification.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which allowed the assessee an opportunity to submit details for disallowances and TDS credit verification. The assessee was undergoing insolvency proceedings with a moratorium in place.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in remanding the matter back to the AO for verification of details when the assessee had failed to provide them earlier. Whether the CIT(A) has the power to set aside issues for reconsideration by the AO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 144B,Section 145(2),Section 272A(1)(d)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: These are two appeals preferred by the Revenue against the common order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter in short ‘the Ld.CIT(A)’), Delhi, dated
2023 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter in short ‘AY’) 2017-18. Subject matter of is the regular/original
assessment order passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(hereinafter in short ‘the Act’) dated 25.12.2019; and ITA
No.15/Chny/2024 is in respect of AO’s re-asses
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026