PRATAPMAL JAWANTHRAJ BHANDARI CHARITABLE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT (EXEMPITONS), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order without providing an adequate opportunity to be heard. The matter was remitted back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed exemption under Section 11, but the CPC denied it because Form 10B was allegedly not filed on time. The assessee contended that Form 10B was filed before the due date and provided evidence, but the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order.
What were the issues?
Whether the exemption under Section 11 was rightly denied due to alleged late filing of Form 10B, and whether the CIT(A) erred by passing an ex-parte order without proper opportunity.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI SS VISWANETHRA RAVI & SHRI JAGADISH
Pratapmal Jawanthraj Bhandari The Dy. Commissioner of Charitable Trust, Vs. Income Tax (Exemptions), 121 Pycrofts Road (1st Floor), Chennai. Royapettah, Chennai-600004. [PAN: AAATP-4699-J] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथE की ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri M. Karunakaran, Advocate GHथE की ओर से /Respondent by : Shri G. Suresh, JCIT सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 22.05.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 19.06.2024 आदेश / O R D E R PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2021-22 is against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, Addl/JCIT(A)-3, Bengaluru [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] dated 18.03.2024 vide an intimation issued by CPC, Bengaluru dated 14.09.2022 u/s. 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”). :- 2 -:
The CPC, Bengaluru in the intimation issued u/s. 143(1) of the Act has denied the exemption claimed by the assessee Trust u/s. 11 of the Act on the ground that audit report in Form-10B has not been filled within the prescribed time.
The Ld. A.R has submitted that the assessee trust has been filed Form-10B for A.Y 2021-22 on 01.11.2021 under transaction ID- FOS000354454499. The Ld. A.R has submitted that the due date of submission of Form 10B for A.Y 2021-22 was 15.02.2022 which was further extended to 15.03.2200 and assessee has filled it on 01.11.2021. The Ld. A.R in support has submitted the copy of audited report and the evidence in support of uploading of Form 10B and contended that the Ld. CIT(A) without providing opportunity of being heard has held that Form-10B has not been filled as it is not seen on the e-filing portal .
We have heard the rival contentions, and perused the materials available on record. We find that the order has been passed by Ld. CIT(A) ex-parte without providing adequate opportunity of being heard The assessee in support of its contention that Form 10B has been filled before the prescribed date has submitted the copy of Form 10b signed by auditor and the transaction ID by which document was :- 3 -: uploaded. We therefore remit the matter back to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to adjudicate this appeal afresh in accordance with law, after giving reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 19th June, 2024. (यस यस िव"ने" रिव) (जगदीश) (Jagadish) (SS Viswanethra Ravi) लेखा सद"य लेखा सद"य /Accountant Member लेखा लेखा सद"य सद"य सद"य / Judicial Member "याियक सद"य "याियक "याियक "याियक सद"य सद"य चे"ई/Chennai, "दनांक/Dated: 19th June, 2024. EDN/-
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026