INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SONEPAT, SONEPAT vs. YOGINDER KUMAR & SONS (HUF), SONEPAT
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARAAssessment Year: 2019-20
This Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2019-20, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National
Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s
DIN & Order No : ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1077154764(1), dated 18.06.2025 involving proceedings under section 147 r.w.s
144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.
Assessee by Shri Manoj Kumar, Advocate
Department by Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR
Date of hearing
26.11.2025
Date of pronouncement
26.11.2025
2 | P a g e
It emerges at the outset that the Revenue's instant appeal involves tax effect of Rs.11,51,171/- which is less than the minimum tax effect prescribed of Rs.60 lakhs in the CBDT latest Circular No. 9/2024, dated 17.09.2024. 4. Learned Departmental Representative is indeed very fair in not disputing the fact that the CBDT's foregoing tax effect circular has been made applicable with retrospective effect on all pending appeals as well. I thus reject the Revenue's instant appeal for this precise reason subject to all just exceptions. 5. This Revenue's appeal is dismissed in above terms. Order pronounced in the open court on 26th November, 2025. (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: 26th November, 2025. f{x~{tÜ
f{x~{tÜ
f{x~{tÜ
f{x~{tÜ