NEHA KAPIL,GURGAON vs. ITO WARD 43(8), DELHI

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National
Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s
DIN & Order No : ITBA/NFAC/S/250 /2024-25/1070288827(1), dated 12.11.2024 involving proceedings under section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.
2. Learned counsel submits that on account of communication gaps at various levels, the assessee could not Assessee by Shri Ayush, CA
Department by Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR
Date of hearing
26.11.2025
Date of pronouncement
26.11.2025
2 | P a g e appear to plead and prove all the relevant facts in the lower appellate proceedings; and; therefore, the matter may be restored back to the Assessing Officer. The Revenue vehemently supports the learned lower authority’s action making the addition(s) herein on merits.
3. Be that as it may, the fact remains that possibility of some communication gaps at various levels in such an instance of the newly introduced virtual hearing mechanism could not be altogether ruled out. It is therefore deemed appropriate in the larger interest of justice to restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the Assessing Officer for his afresh appropriate adjudication, within three effective opportunities of hearing at the appellant’s risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.
5. This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 26th November, 2025. (SATBEER SINGH GODARA)

JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated: 26th November, 2025. f{x~{tÜ
f{x~{tÜ
f{x~{tÜ
f{x~{tÜ
3 | P a g e