KRISHNASAMY MARUTHUPANDIAN,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. ITO, CORP WARD 4, MADURAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) failed to consider the assessee's contention that their total income was below the exemption limit, thus no advance tax was payable. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee did not file a return of income, leading to an ex-parte assessment where credits in the bank account were added as unexplained money. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal for non-admission, citing non-payment of advance tax.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) correctly dismissed the appeal without considering the assessee's claim of no advance tax liability due to income below the exemption limit.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGHAND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL
O R D E R
PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT:
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 24/1058168632 (1) dated 23.11.2023. The assessment was framed by the Addl./Joint/Deputy/Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax/Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi
- 2 - 2013-14 u/s.147 r.w.s.144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’) vide order dated 19.03.2022.
The only issue in this appeal of assessee is against the order of CIT(A)-NFAC confirming the action of AO in adding the credits in the bank account amounting to Rs.7,72,83,031/- as unexplained money u/s.69A of the Act by holding that the assessee’s appeal is dismissed as un-admitted and infructuous for the reason that the assessee has not paid an amount equal to the amount of advance tax in term of section 249(4)(b) of the Act.
Briefly stated facts are that the assessee has not filed his return of income and accordingly, notice u/s.148 r.w.s. 147 of the Act was issued and assessment was framed ex-parte u/s.147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act of the Act by the AO vide order dated 19.03.2022 by adding the credits deposited in the assessee’s bank account amounting to Rs.7,72,83,031/-. Aggrieved, assessee preferred appeal before CIT(A).
The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal as unadmitted by giving the reason that the assessee has not paid an amount equal to the amount of advance tax which was payable by him in term of section 249(4)(b) of the Act. The CIT(A)-NFAC observed as under:-
- 3 - “4. Since the appellant has not filed return of income as well as not paid an amount equal to the amount of advance tax which was payable by it, present appeal is not liable to be admitted. The appeal is infructuous and is, therefore, dismissed.”
Aggrieved, now assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.
We have heard rival contentions and gone through facts and circumstances of the case. We noted that the assessee before CIT(A) contended that the assessee’s total income for the impugned assessment year 2013-14 was less than the exemption limit of Rs.2,00,000/- and there is no liability for payment of advance tax. We noted that this fact is not considered by CIT(A)-NFAC and even, the CIT(A)-NFAC has to give a finding in term of proviso to section 249(4)(b) of the Act, wherein the assessee can adduce good and sufficient reason for not paying advance tax. The relevant proviso to section 249(4)(b) reads as under:- (4) No appeal under this Chapter shall be admitted unless at the time of filing of the appeal,— (a) where a return has been filed by the assessee, the assessee has paid the tax due on the income returned by him; or (b) where no return has been filed by the assessee, the assessee has paid an amount equal to the amount of advance tax which was payable by him: Provided that, in a case falling under clause (b) and on an application made by the appellant in this behalf, the Commissioner (Appeals) may, for any good and sufficient reason to be recorded in writing, exempt him from the operation of the provisions of that clause.
In view of the above provision and argument of the assessee before us that the assessee’s total income for the relevant assessment year
- 4 - 2013-14 was less than Rs.2,00,000/- and there was no liability of payment of advance tax, the CIT(A)-NFAC has to examine the above provision in totality, which he failed to do. Hence, we set aside the order of CIT(A)-NFAC and remand the matter back to his file for fresh adjudication after considering the provisions of section 249(4)(b) of the Act as mentioned above. In term of the above, matter restored back to the file of CIT(A) and allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing on 24th June, 2024 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026