Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI JAGADISH
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘सी’ �ायपीठ, चे�ई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI �ी महावीर िसंह, उपा� एवं �ी जगदीश, लेखा सद' के सम BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.674/Chny/2024 िनधा9रण वष9 /Assessment Year: 2017-18
Pradeepshetty, Income Tax Officer, 2/2 Vadakku Thottam, Vs. Ward-2, Parapalayam, Tirupur – 641 604, Tirupur. Tamil Nadu. [PAN: AFOPP-2838-L] (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) अपीलाथG की ओर से/ Appellant by Shri T.S. Lakshmi Venkatraman, FCA : IJथG की ओर से /Respondent by Shri M. Murali, CIT : सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 04.06.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 26.06.2024 आदेश / O R D E R PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] dated 20.02.2024 in the matter of assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s.147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”) on 22.03.2022.
ITA No.674/Chny/2024 :- 2 -:
The assessee has not filed return of income for A.Y 2017-18.
The A.O has reopened the assessment u/s. 147 of the Act and passed
ex-parte assessment u/s. 144 of the Act as the assessee has not
complied with the notices issued on 15.11.2021, 14.12.2021 &
27.12.2021. The A.O has made the following additions:
Addition of unexplained money u/s. 69A Rs. 1,15,32,735/- of the Act Addition of unexplained investment u/s. Rs. 1,84,69,800/- 69A of the Act Addition of unexplained expenditure u/s. Rs. 81,60,453/- 69C of the Act Addition of undisclosed income (interest) Rs.14,13,375/- Addition of unexplained expenditure to Rs. 32,562/- foreign company u/s 69C of the Act
The Ld. CIT(A) has issued notice on 02.11.2023, 12.01.2024 and
23.01.2024, but the assessee has not made any submissions. The Ld.
CIT(A) therefore dismissed the assessee’s appeal confirming all the
additions ex-parte.
The Ld. A.R pleaded that the assessment order and Ld. CIT(A)
orders have been passed ex-parte, therefore one more opportunity be
provided in the interest of justice. The Ld. A.R also submitted that the
assessment was made during Covid period and therefore, compliance
could not be made.
ITA No.674/Chny/2024 :- 3 -:
The Ld. Departmental Representative submitted that the appeal
may be dismissed as the assessee has not made any compliance for
the notices.
We have heard the rival contentions, and perused the materials
available on record. We find that the assessee has not filed return of
income for the A.Y 2017-18 and the assessment order has been
passed ex-parte u/s. 144 of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) has also passed
the order ex-parte. The Bench accepts the submission of Ld. AR by
observing that after all the orders of the lower authorities are ex-parte
orders and keeping in mind the principles of natural justice, the
assessee be provided with another opportunity of hearing. Therefore,
the impugned orders are set-aside for de-novo assessment to the AO
subject to the condition of payment of Rs.5,000/- towards cost in
favour of the State Legal Aid Authority at Hon’ble Madras High Court
within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order. The assessee
shall furnish complete details before the AO for his consideration and
co-operate in assessment proceeding.
ITA No.674/Chny/2024 :- 4 -:
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 26th June, 2024.
Sd/- Sd/- (महावीर िसंह) (जगदीश) (Jagadish) (Mahavir Singh) लेखा लेखा सद�य लेखा लेखा सद�य सद�य /Accountant Member सद�य उपा� / Vice President चे�ई/Chennai, �दनांक/Dated: 26th June, 2024. EDN/- आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�/CIT, Tiruppur, Coimbatore 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड� फाईल/GF