CHARITABLE TRUST SULAIMAN ALIM,CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

The assessee has filed on-line applications on 01.09.2023 in Form No. 10AB under section 12(1)(ac)(iii) seeking registration under section 12AB of the Act. The ld. CIT(E) issued a letter dated 08.11.2023 requesting the assessee to furnish certain certified copies of documents including Note on activities and annual accounts/financial statements of the institution. On perusal of the details furnished by the assessee, the ld. CIT(E) has noted in Form 10AB that one of the objects of the assessee in Column 5 is religious, whereas, in Column 3 the assessee has declared the nature of activities as “Charitable Trust. As the assessee cannot apply for seeking registration of Charitable Trust with religious objects, the assessee was asked to show-cause as to why its application dated 01.09.2023 in Form No. 10AB should not be rejected. In response to the above show-cause notice, the assessee filed reply on 23.03.2024 explaining that while filing Form 10AB, in Column 5, due to clerical error, they have included “Religious” as one of the objects of the trust and expressed its apology for the mistake and prayed for grant of registration under section 12AB of the Act as well as grant of approval under section 80G of the Act. However, since the processing of application and granting of registration are carried in ITBA and there is

Heard both parties and perused the material available on record. The ld. AR Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate has submitted that while filing the application in Form 10AB in Column 5, due to clerical error, the assessee has included “Religious” as one of the objects of the trust and also submitted that the mistake was not deliberate, without any intention. He further submitted that due to the inadvertent mistake, the assessee trust cannot be deprived of granting registration under section 12AB of the Act as well as grant of approval under section 80G of the Act. The ld. DR Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT has supported the order passed by the ld. CIT(E). We find force in the argument of the ld. AR. Thus, taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of natural justice, we deem it proper to remand the matter back to the file of the ld. CIT(E) for fresh consideration in terms of the steps that the assessee may take in making correction as “charitable” instead of “religious”. Thus, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 26th June, 2024 at Chennai.