INDIA CARE MISSION TRUST,,MADURAI vs. ACIT, EXEMPTIONS,, COIMBATORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1255/CHNY/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 June 2024AY 2017-18Bench: SHRI SS VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member), SHRI JAGADISH (Accountant Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) order was passed ex-parte for non-compliance. Upholding principles of natural justice, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order and remitted the matter back for a fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was decided ex-parte due to non-compliance. The assessee requested the matter be restored to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision, arguing the order was passed ex-parte.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) order passed ex-parte violates principles of natural justice and if the matter should be remanded for a fresh hearing.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: SHRI SS VISWANETHRA RAVI & SHRI JAGADISH

Hearing: 25.06.2024Pronounced: 27.06.2024

O R D E R PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18 arises out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] dated 19.08.2024 in the matter of assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 143(3) of the Act on 31.12.2019. :- 2 -:

2.

The Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) has passed the order ex-parte and therefore, the matter may be restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for deciding the issue afresh after considering the submissions.

3.

On the other hand, the Ld. D.R argued that the assessee has not made any submissions, despite of sufficient opportunities provided to the assessee.

4.

We have heard the rival submissions, perused the materials available on record. On perusal of the order of the Ld. CIT(A), we find that the order has been passed by Ld. CIT(A) ex-parte for the non- compliance of the assessee. We are of the opinion that keeping in view the principles of natural justice, the assessee be provided with another opportunity of hearing to substantiate his case before the Ld. CIT(A). Accordingly, we set aside the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) and remit the matter back to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to adjudicate this appeal afresh in accordance with law, after giving reasonable opportunity to the assessee. We also direct the Assessee to appear before the Ld. CIT(A) on the date of hearing without fail. In view of the above, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. :- 3 -:

5.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 27th June, 2024. (यस यस िव"ने" रिव) (जगदीश) (Jagadish) (SS Viswanethra Ravi) "ाियक सद /Judicial Member लेखा लेखा सद"य लेखा लेखा सद"य सद"य /Accountant Member सद"य चे"ई/Chennai, "दनांक/Dated: 27th June, 2024. EDN/-

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →