FETNA TRUST,COIMBATORE vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI

PDF
ITA 1073/CHNY/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 June 2024Bench: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY (Judicial Member), SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member)3 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL

Hearing: 24.06.2024Pronounced: 27.06.2024

आदेश / O R D E R

PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the

Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), (hereinafter in short

‘the Ld.CIT(E)’), Chennai, dated 27.10.2023 rejecting the application filed

on 25.04.2023 in Form 10AB under clause (iii) of first proviso to

Sec.80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter in short ‘the Act’).

2.

At the outset, it is noted that there is delay of ‘113’ days in filing

of this appeal and assessee has filed Condonation petition. Having

perused the same, we are satisfied that there is reasonable cause for

ITA No.1073/Chny/2024 (AY -) Fetna Trust :: 2 ::

the delay. So, we condone the delay and proceed to adjudicate the

appeal.

3.

The Ld.AR of the assessee pointed out that the Ld.CIT(E) has

passed an ex parte order qua assessee, since assessee didn’t respond to

his notice. According to the assessee, it has not received notice of hearing

due to some glitches in the internet/computer. Therefore, he prays for

one more opportunity.

3.

Per contra, the Ld.DR does not want us to give assessee one more

innings.

4.

Having heard both the parties and after perusal of records, we note

that impugned order of the Ld.CIT(E) is an ex parte order qua assessee.

We note that the Ld.CIT(E) had directed the assessee to file relevant

documents, which, according to the Ld.CIT(E), assessee failed to file and

instead sought adjournment, but didn’t file the relevant documents.

Therefore, he dismissed the appeal of the assessee. According to the

Ld.AR, omission to file documents called for by the Ld.CIT(E) is not

deliberate and given an opportunity, the assessee undertakes to file all

the documents called for by the Ld.CIT(E). Considering the overall facts

and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to grant one more

opportunity to the assessee and therefore, we set aside the impugned

order of the Ld.CIT(E) and restore the application dated 25.04.2023 back

ITA No.1073/Chny/2024 (AY -) Fetna Trust :: 3 :: to the file of the Ld.CIT(E) and direct him to decide the application in accordance to law and the assessee is also directed to be diligent and file relevant documents/written submissions before the Ld.CIT(E) and the Ld.CIT(E) to decide the application in accordance to law.

5.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on the 27th day of June, 2024, in Chennai.

Sd/- Sd/- (मनोज कुमार अ�वाल) (एबी टी. वक�) (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) (ABY T. VARKEY) लेखा सद�य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER �याियक सद�य/JUDICIAL MEMBER चे�ई/Chennai, �दनांक/Dated: 27th June, 2024. TLN, Sr.PS आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकरआयु�/CIT, Chennai / Madurai / Salem / Coimbatore. 4. िवभागीय�ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड�फाईल/GF

FETNA TRUST,COIMBATORE vs CIT(EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI | BharatTax